Cited by 270Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological diseases and metabolism

Increased Iron Levels and Decreased Tissue Integrity in Hippocampus of Alzheimer’s Disease Detected in vivo with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Raven, Erika P., Lu, Po H., Tishler, Todd A., Heydari, Panthea, Bartzokis, George·2013·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron can catalyze damaging free radical reactions. With age, iron accumulates in brain gray matter regions and may contribute to the risk of developing age-related diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Prior MRI studies demonstrated increased iron deposits in basal ganglia regions; however, the hippocampus (Hipp), which is heavily damaged in AD, and comparator regions that are resistant to AD damage, such as thalamus (Th), have rarely been examined. OBJECTIVE: To assess iron levels and evidence of tissue damage in Hipp and Th of AD subjects and healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty-one AD and sixty-eight healthy control subjects participated in this study. High- and low-field strength MRI instruments were used in combination to quantify iron content of ferritin molecules (ferritin iron) using the field dependent relaxation rate increase (FDRI) method. Decreased transverse relaxation rate (R2) was used as an index of tissue damage. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, AD subjects had increased ferritin iron in Hipp (p = 0.019) but not Th (p = 0.637), and significantly decreased R2 in Hipp (p < 0.001) but not Th (p = 0.37). In the entire sample, FDRI and R2 were negatively correlated. CONCLUSION: The data shows that in AD, Hipp damage occurs in conjunction with ferritin iron accumulation. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate how increasing iron levels may influence the trajectory of tissue damage and cognitive and pathologic manifestations of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-130209

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 270

Authors
Raven, E. P., Lu, P. H., Tishler, T. A., Heydari, P., & Bartzokis, G.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Bartzokis, George
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1561232794
Cited by
270
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG027342, AG027342)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH0266029)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS041231)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Ferritins, Hippocampus, Humans, Iron, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review