Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Estrogen Receptor β Variants Modify Risk for Alzheimer's Disease in a Multiethnic Female Cohort

Janicki, Sarah C., Park, Naeun, Cheng, Rong, Lee, Joseph H., Schupf, Nicole, Clark, Lorraine N.·2014·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background Few studies of gene variants that affect estrogen activity investigate their association with age at onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in women of different ethnicities. We investigated the influence of ESR2 polymorphisms on age at onset of AD in a multiethnic cohort of women. Objectives To determine whether gene variants would affect risk for AD differently in women of different population ancestries. Methods Among 1,686 women participating in the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP), association with risk for AD was assessed for 20 ESR2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age at time of study enrollment, presence of an APOE ε4 allele, years of education, and body mass index. Results Increased risk for AD was associated with four ESR2 SNPs in women of predominantly Caucasian AIMS-defined ancestry: rs944045, rs1256062, rs10144225, and rs2274705 (OR range 1.6-1.9, empiric p-value range 0.002-0.004). A separate SNP (rs10137185) was associated with decreased risk for AD in women who identified themselves as Black (OR 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9). When vascular risk factors were included in the model, a separate SNP (rs1256059) was associated with increased risk for AD in women of admixed/Hispanic ancestry (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.4). Conclusions ESR2 polymorphisms affect risk for AD in women, and risk alleles vary by AIMs-defined ancestry and self-identified ethnicity. These effects are possibly du…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-130551

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dynamics of sexually dimorphic hormones such as estrogen may affect different brain regions disproportionally.

    “the dynamics of sexually dimorphic hormones such as estrogen [61–63] may affect different brain regions disproportionally.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janicki, S. C., Park, N., Cheng, R., Lee, J. H., Schupf, N., & Clark, L. N.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2014-03-10
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1851104752
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U24AG021886)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, estrogen receptor beta
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Ethnicity, Female, Genotype, Humans, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Estrogen Receptor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review