Estrogen Receptor β Variants Modify Risk for Alzheimer's Disease in a Multiethnic Female Cohort
Abstract
Background Few studies of gene variants that affect estrogen activity investigate their association with age at onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in women of different ethnicities. We investigated the influence of ESR2 polymorphisms on age at onset of AD in a multiethnic cohort of women. Objectives To determine whether gene variants would affect risk for AD differently in women of different population ancestries. Methods Among 1,686 women participating in the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP), association with risk for AD was assessed for 20 ESR2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age at time of study enrollment, presence of an APOE ε4 allele, years of education, and body mass index. Results Increased risk for AD was associated with four ESR2 SNPs in women of predominantly Caucasian AIMS-defined ancestry: rs944045, rs1256062, rs10144225, and rs2274705 (OR range 1.6-1.9, empiric p-value range 0.002-0.004). A separate SNP (rs10137185) was associated with decreased risk for AD in women who identified themselves as Black (OR 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9). When vascular risk factors were included in the model, a separate SNP (rs1256059) was associated with increased risk for AD in women of admixed/Hispanic ancestry (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.4). Conclusions ESR2 polymorphisms affect risk for AD in women, and risk alleles vary by AIMs-defined ancestry and self-identified ethnicity. These effects are possibly du…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dynamics of sexually dimorphic hormones such as estrogen may affect different brain regions disproportionally.
“the dynamics of sexually dimorphic hormones such as estrogen [61–63] may affect different brain regions disproportionally.”
From Sex specific molecular networks and key drivers of Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex specific molecular networks and key drivers of Alzheimer’s disease
Guo, L., Cao, J., Hou, J., Li, Y., Huang, M., Zhu, L., Zhang, L., Lee, Y., Duarte, M. L., Zhou, X., et al. (2023) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00624-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Janicki, S. C., Park, N., Cheng, R., Lee, J. H., Schupf, N., & Clark, L. N.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-03-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1851104752
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (U24AG021886)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, estrogen receptor beta
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Ethnicity, Female, Genotype, Humans, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Estrogen Receptor beta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review