Relationship among diffusion tensor imaging, EEG activity, and cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease patients
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural alterations by means of fractional anisotropy (FA) in patients with dementia, also in relation to cognitive status. The present study aimed at investigating the possible relation among white matter damage in DTI, quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) spectral power, and cognitive status in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. Forty-seven subjects (8 moderate AD, 18 mild AD, 12 MCI, and 9 healthy controls) underwent brain MR, neuropsychological evaluation, and resting EEG recording. A progressive increase of EEG delta and theta spectral power was observed from controls to patients, mainly in more anterior areas, with a parallel widespread decrease of beta power. Moreover, a progressive decrease of FA from controls to patients in frontal areas and in the corpus callosum (genu) was observed. Correlation analyses indicated convergence among EEG rhythms changes, DTI values, and cognitive status mainly over anterior areas. The decrease of FA values and EEG spectral power changes might represent markers of neurodegenerative dysfunction, possibly preceding macrostructural atrophy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher FA is related to interhemispheric transition time measured with event-related potentials (ERP) and quantitative electroencephalography (EEG).
“Moreover, a higher FA has been related to interhemispheric transition time measured with event-related potentials (ERP) 45 and quantitative electroencephalography (EEG). 46”
From Physical exercise keeps the brain connected: biking increases white matter integrity in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Scrascia, F., Curcio, G., Ursini, F., Trotta, L., Quintiliani, L., Migliore, S., Altamura, C., Pitocco, F., Altavilla, R., Melgari, J.-M., Quattrocchi, C. C., & Vernieri, F.
- Affiliations
- Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
- University of L'Aquila (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Vernieri, Fabrizio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-12-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 939-950
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1878862510
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Single-Blind Method, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review