Cited by 22Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Relationship among diffusion tensor imaging, EEG activity, and cognitive status in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease patients

Scrascia, Federica, Curcio, Giuseppe, Ursini, Francesca, Trotta, Laura, Quintiliani, Livia, Migliore, Simone, Altamura, Claudia, Pitocco, Francesca +4 more·2013·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural alterations by means of fractional anisotropy (FA) in patients with dementia, also in relation to cognitive status. The present study aimed at investigating the possible relation among white matter damage in DTI, quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) spectral power, and cognitive status in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. Forty-seven subjects (8 moderate AD, 18 mild AD, 12 MCI, and 9 healthy controls) underwent brain MR, neuropsychological evaluation, and resting EEG recording. A progressive increase of EEG delta and theta spectral power was observed from controls to patients, mainly in more anterior areas, with a parallel widespread decrease of beta power. Moreover, a progressive decrease of FA from controls to patients in frontal areas and in the corpus callosum (genu) was observed. Correlation analyses indicated convergence among EEG rhythms changes, DTI values, and cognitive status mainly over anterior areas. The decrease of FA values and EEG spectral power changes might represent markers of neurodegenerative dysfunction, possibly preceding macrostructural atrophy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-130788

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 22

Authors
Scrascia, F., Curcio, G., Ursini, F., Trotta, L., Quintiliani, L., Migliore, S., Altamura, C., Pitocco, F., Altavilla, R., Melgari, J.-M., Quattrocchi, C. C., & Vernieri, F.
Affiliations
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
Corresponding author
Vernieri, Fabrizio
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
939-950
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1878862510
Cited by
22
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Single-Blind Method, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review