Cited by 42Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

The perseverance time of informal carers of dementia patients: validation of a new measure to initiate transition of care at home to nursing home care

Kraijo, Henk, Brouwer, Werner, de Leeuw, Rob, Schrijvers, Guus, van Exel, Job·2014·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care systems aim to involve as much informal care as possible and dementia patients prefer to stay home as long as they can. In this context, perseverance time (Pt)-the period that the informal carer indicates to be able to maintain current care if the situation remains stable-is an important concept. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to introduce the concept Pt and validate it in a sample of informal carers of dementia patients living at home. METHODS: Data were collected from 223 informal carers of dementia patients. Convergent validity was assessed by looking at associations of Pt with validated instruments for measuring subjective burden (CSI, CarerQol-7D, and SRB) and happiness (CarerQol-VAS). Content validity was evaluated by performing multivariate correlations between Pt and characteristics of dementia patients, informal carers, and care situations. The Medical Ethics Committee of Utrecht MC advised positively about the study protocol. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between Pt and the measures of burden CSI, SRB, and CarerQol-VAS were -0.46, -0.63, and 0.23 (p < 0.01), respectively. Health of dementia patient, informal carer living apart from the patient, and male gender of caregiver were positively associated with Pt; need for supervision, intensity of informal care provision, and reductions in working hours and hobbies in order to be able to provide care were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Pt is helpful in monitoring need for support and planning the transition of care from home to nursing home. This study provides a first indication of its validity, but replication is necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-132420

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 42

Authors
Kraijo, H., Brouwer, W., de Leeuw, R., Schrijvers, G., & van Exel, J.
Affiliations
  • Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht MC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Institute of Health Policy & Management (iBMG), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2014-04-23
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
631-642
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1531348160
Cited by
42
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
informal caregivers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Nursing Homes, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review