Cited by 484Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tan, Chen-Chen, Yu, Jin-Tai, Wang, Hui-Fu, Tan, Meng-Shan, Meng, Xiang-Fei, Wang, Chong, Jiang, Teng, Zhu, Xi-Chen +1 more·2014·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of currently available drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been controversial, with some national formularies restricting their use, and health economists questioning whether the small clinical effects are economically worthwhile. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of AD. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, with random assignment to a cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine trials were included into the pooled studies. RESULTS: Cognitive effects were significant for all drugs, ranging from a -1.29 points mean difference (95% CI -2.30 to -0.28) in the 20 mg daily memantine trials to -3.20 points (95% CI -3.28 to -3.12) in the 32 mg daily galantamine group. Only memantine had no effect on the Clinicians' Global Impression of Change scale. No behavioral benefits were observed, except for -2.72 (95% CI -4.92 to -0.52) in the 10 mg daily donepezil group and -1.72 (95% CI -3.12 to -0.33) for 24 mg daily galantamine trial. Only 5 mg daily donepezil had no effect on the function outcome. Compared with placebo, more dropouts and adverse events occurred with the cholinesterase inhibitors, but not with memantine. CONCLUSIONS: Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are able to stabilize or slow decline in cognition, function, behavior, and global change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-132690

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only five drugs-galantamine, rivastigmine, donepezil, memantine, and a combination of donepezil and memantine-were previously FDA-approved for Alzheimer's disease treatment.

    “As such, despite the high prevalence of AD, only five drugs, consisting of galantamine, rivastigmine, donepezil, memantine, and a combination of donepezil and memantine, have been previously FDA-approved for its treatment [10].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 484

Authors
Tan, C.-C., Yu, J.-T., Wang, H.-F., Tan, M.-S., Meng, X.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, T., Zhu, X.-C., & Tan, L.
Affiliations
  • Qingdao University (CN)
  • Qingdao Municipal Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
Corresponding author
Tan, Lan
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2014-06-23
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
615-631
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1759290616
Cited by
484
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 14
FWCI
30.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, donepezil
MeSH terms
Rivastigmine, Donepezil, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Galantamine, Humans, Indans, Memantine, Piperidines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents, Phenylcarbamates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review