Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of currently available drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been controversial, with some national formularies restricting their use, and health economists questioning whether the small clinical effects are economically worthwhile. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of AD. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, with random assignment to a cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine trials were included into the pooled studies. RESULTS: Cognitive effects were significant for all drugs, ranging from a -1.29 points mean difference (95% CI -2.30 to -0.28) in the 20 mg daily memantine trials to -3.20 points (95% CI -3.28 to -3.12) in the 32 mg daily galantamine group. Only memantine had no effect on the Clinicians' Global Impression of Change scale. No behavioral benefits were observed, except for -2.72 (95% CI -4.92 to -0.52) in the 10 mg daily donepezil group and -1.72 (95% CI -3.12 to -0.33) for 24 mg daily galantamine trial. Only 5 mg daily donepezil had no effect on the function outcome. Compared with placebo, more dropouts and adverse events occurred with the cholinesterase inhibitors, but not with memantine. CONCLUSIONS: Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are able to stabilize or slow decline in cognition, function, behavior, and global change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only five drugs-galantamine, rivastigmine, donepezil, memantine, and a combination of donepezil and memantine-were previously FDA-approved for Alzheimer's disease treatment.
“As such, despite the high prevalence of AD, only five drugs, consisting of galantamine, rivastigmine, donepezil, memantine, and a combination of donepezil and memantine, have been previously FDA-approved for its treatment [10].”
From The Multifaceted Role of Neuroprotective Plants in Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 484
- Authors
- Tan, C.-C., Yu, J.-T., Wang, H.-F., Tan, M.-S., Meng, X.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, T., Zhu, X.-C., & Tan, L.
- Affiliations
- Qingdao University (CN)
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital (CN)
- Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, School of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Corresponding author
- Tan, Lan
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-23
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 615-631
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1759290616
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 14
- FWCI
- 30.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, donepezil
- MeSH terms
- Rivastigmine, Donepezil, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Galantamine, Humans, Indans, Memantine, Piperidines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents, Phenylcarbamates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review