Cited by 26Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilitySpatial Cognition and NavigationDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autonomous Spatial Orientation in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease by using Mobile Assistive Devices: A Pilot Study

Lanza, Claudia, Knörzer, Oliver, Weber, Michael, Riepe, Matthias W.·2014·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background/objective Spatial orientation declines early in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is a major cause for institutionalization of patients. Methods Use of either an aerial map or an assistive device to get from start to goal zone, both located on the campus of the hospital (distance between start and goal zone 300 m to 500 m). Use of the assistive device was trained for 15 minutes prior to the task. Results We assessed 14 patients with mild to moderate AD (DSM-IV and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria; 9 female patients, 5 male patients; age 71.9 ± 7.4 years; MMSE 21.7 ± 2.9 (mean ± SD), range 16-26). Each patient had to find the way for three different routes with different start and goal zones. None of the patients found their way to the goal zone for any of the routes when using an aerial map in which the way was highlighted. With use of the assistive device, patients found their way from start to goal zones autonomously for 20 of 42 routes (3 routes each for 14 patients). For 22 of 42 routes intermediate re-assurance was necessary, but herewith routes were completed. Conclusion This study lays ground for the use of mobile technical devices in patients with mild to moderate AD. Mobile assistive devices may enable patients with mild to moderate AD to maintain autonomous spatial orientation in unfamiliar environments. Improvement of the familiarization of patients with the device and further sophistication of assistive cues is likely to further improve autonomous use of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-140063

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Lanza, C., Knörzer, O., Weber, M., & Riepe, M. W.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
879-884
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1663410863
Cited by
26
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, spatial orientation
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Perceptual Disorders, Pilot Projects, Self-Help Devices, Space Perception, Mobile Applications, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review