Somatic Signature of Brain-Specific Single Nucleotide Variations in Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease
Open accessAbstract
Background: Although genome-wide association studies have shown that genetic factors increase the risk of suffering late-onset, sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (SAD), the molecular mechanisms responsible remain largely unknown. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of somatic, brain-specific single nucleotide variations (SNV) in the hippocampus of SAD samples. Methods: By using bioinformatic tools, we compared whole exome sequences in paired blood and hippocampal genomic DNAs from 17 SAD patients and from 2 controls and 2 vascular dementia patients. Results: We found a remarkable number of SNVs in SAD brains (~575 per patient) that were not detected in blood. Loci with hippocampus-specific (hs)-SNVs were common to several patients, with 38 genes being present in 6 or more patients out of the 17. While some of these SNVs were in genes previously related to SAD (e.g., CSMD1, LRP2), most hs-SNVs occurred in loci previously unrelated to SAD. The most frequent genes with hs-SNVs were associated with neurotransmission, DNA metabolism, neuronal transport, and muscular function. Interestingly, 19 recurrent hs-SNVs were common to 3 SAD patients. Repetitive loci or hs-SNVs were underrepresented in the hippocampus of control or vascular dementia donors, or in the cerebellum of SAD patients. Conclusion: Our data suggest that adult blood and brain have different DNA genomic variations, and that somatic genetic mosaicism and brain-specific genome reshaping may contribute to SAD pathogenesis and cognitive differences between individuals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurons from AD patients have an enriched number of somatic variations not observed in peripheral DNA.
“neurons from AD patients have been observed to have an enriched number of somatic variations not observed in peripheral DNA [239, 240]”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [240]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 127 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Parcerisas, A., Rubio, S. E., Muhaisen, A., Gómez-Ramos, A., Pujadas, L., Puiggros, M., Rossi, D., Ureña, J., Burgaya, F., Pascual, M., Torrents, D., Rábano, A., Ávila, J., & Soriano, E.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED, ISCIII), Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Joint IRB-BSC Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Fundacion Centro De Investigacion De Enfermedades Neurologicas (ES)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Soriano, Eduardo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1357-1382
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1711977572
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Fundación BBVA
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
- Universidad de Oviedo
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- sporadic Alzheimer's disease, somatic mutations
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebellum, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Dementia, Vascular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Exome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review