Can a virtual reality cognitive training application fulfill a dual role? Using the virtual supermarket cognitive training application as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research advocates the potential of virtual reality (VR) applications in assessing cognitive functions highlighting the possibility of using a VR application for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate whether a VR cognitive training application, the virtual supermarket (VSM), can be used as a screening tool for MCI. METHODS: Two groups, one of healthy older adults (n = 21) and one of MCI patients (n = 34), were recruited from day centers for cognitive disorders and administered the VSM and a neuropsychological test battery. The performance of the two groups in the VSM was compared and correlated with performance in established neuropsychological tests. At the same time, the effectiveness of a combination of traditional neuropsychological tests and the VSM was examined. RESULTS: VSM displayed a correct classification rate (CCR) of 87.30% when differentiating between MCI patients and healthy older adults, while it was unable to differentiate between MCI subtypes. At the same time, the VSM correlates with various established neuropsychological tests. A limited number of tests were able to improve the CCR of the VSM when combined with the VSM for screening purposes. DISCUSSION: VSM appears to be a valid method of screening for MCI in an older adult population though it cannot be used for MCI subtype assessment. VSM's concurrent validity is supported by the large number of correlations between the VSM and established tests. It is considered a robust test on its own as the inclusion of other tests failed to improve its CCR significantly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most specific domains for VR diagnostic and training purposes in AD patients include attention, executive functions, memory, orientation, and ADL.
“The most specific domains for VR diagnostic and training purposes in AD patients include attention (322), executive functions (323–326), memory (327–333), orientation (322, 327, 334–336), and ADL (337, 338).”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [325]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Zygouris, S., Giakoumis, D., Votis, K., Doumpoulakis, S., Ntovas, K., Segkouli, S., Karagiannidis, C., Tzovaras, D., & Tsolaki, M.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- Information Technologies Institute (GR)
- Greek Association of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (GR)
- University of Thessaly (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Zygouris, Stelios
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02-19
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1333-1347
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1544801335
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- virtual reality, cognitive training
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Statistics as Topic, User-Computer Interface, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review