Cited by 68Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive debt and Alzheimer’s disease

Marchant, Natalie L., Howard, Robert J.·2015·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

We propose the concept of Cognitive Debt to characterize thoughts and behaviors that increase vulnerability to symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Evidence indicates that depression, anxiety, sleep disorder, neuroticism, life stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder increase risk for AD, and we suggest they do so by increasing Cognitive Debt. Repetitive negative thinking (RNT), a behaviorally measurable process common to these factors, may drive Cognitive Debt acquisition. RNT transcends disorder-specific definition, encompasses rumination and worry, and is defined by perseverative, negative thought tendencies. Evidence of dysregulated stress responses supports the concept of Cognitive Debt, of RNT as its causal mechanism, and of an interaction with the APOE-ε4 genotype to increase vulnerability to clinical AD, independent from traditional AD pathology. Defining a more specific behavioral profile of risk would enable interventions to be targeted earlier and more precisely at individuals most vulnerable to developing AD. Additionally, modulating RNT could potentially reduce risk of clinical AD. Interventions to reduce RNT are discussed, as are suggestions for future research. For these reasons we submit that the Cognitive Debt model may aid understanding of the psychological mechanisms that potentially increase predisposition to AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-141515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 216 · Cited by 68

Authors
Marchant, N. L., & Howard, R. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Marchant, Natalie L.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
755-770
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1823841721
Cited by
68
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive debt, Alzheimer's disease risk
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Thinking, Mood Disorders, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review