Cited by 133Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismMental Health via Writing

Tracking Discourse Complexity Preceding Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: A Case Study Comparing the Press Conferences of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush

Open access
Berisha, Visar, Wang, Shuai, LaCross, Amy, Liss, Julie·2015·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Changes in some lexical features of language have been associated with the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease. Here we describe a method to extract key features from discourse transcripts, which we evaluated on non-scripted news conferences from President Ronald Reagan, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 1994, and President George Herbert Walker Bush, who has no known diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Key word counts previously associated with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease were extracted and regression analyses were conducted. President Reagan showed a significant reduction in the number of unique words over time and a significant increase in conversational fillers and non-specific nouns over time. There was no significant trend in these features for President Bush.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-142763

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 133

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Bird S (2006) NLTK: The natural language toolkit. Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions (Association for Computational Linguistics), pp. 69– 72.

Authors
Berisha, V., Wang, S., LaCross, A., & Liss, J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Berisha, Visar
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2015-03-24
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
959-963
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1600791756
Cited by
133
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006859)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, discourse complexity
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Leadership, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Disease Progression, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review