Elevation of the Plasma Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 Ratio as a Diagnostic Marker of Sporadic Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease
Open accessAbstract
Background: Although plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) levels have been evaluated as a possible diagnostic marker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the findings are inconsistent. Objective: The present study aimed to validate plasma levels of Aβ 40 , Aβ 42 , and the Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio as biomarkers of AD in subjects with early-onset AD (EOAD) without familial AD genetic mutations. Methods: Patients with sporadic EOAD (sEOAD) were prospectively recruited by nine neurology clinics. Plasma levels of Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 100 sEOAD (50–69 year-old) and 46 age-matched normal control subjects (50–72 year-old). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was obtained from 32 sEOAD subjects and 25 controls. The integrity of the blood-brain barrier was assessed using the CSF/plasma albumin ratio. Results: The plasma levels of Aβ 42 were significantly lower, while the Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio was significantly higher in sEOAD patients than in controls. The levels of Aβ 40 , Aβ 42 , and the Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio did not differ in relation to the APOE ɛ 4 allele. The CSF/plasma albumin ratio was comparable between the two groups, and the plasma parameters of Aβ proteins were not significantly associated. A multivariate analysis revealed that an increased Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio is valuable for the discrimination of sEOAD from controls (β= 0.344, p = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve for the Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio was 0.76, and a cut-off ratio of 5.87 was suggested to have 70% sensitivity and 68% specificity. Conclusion: The plasma Aβ 40 /Aβ 42 ratio had moderate validity for the discrimination of sEOAD patients from age-matched controls.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The present Elecsys assays produced among the best accuracies and are the first fully automated assays to have these greater accuracies.
“Although previous studies have found associations between CSF and PET Aβ and plasma Aβ using different immunoassays,7,12,13,14,44,45 the present Elecsys assays produced among the best accuracies and they are the first fully automated assays to have these greater accuracies.”
From Performance of Fully Automated Plasma Assays as Screening Tests for Alzheimer Disease–Related β-Amyloid Status (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wilson, M. R., Yerbury, J. J., & Poon, S. (2007) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/b712728f · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Sharman, M. J., Morici, M., Hone, E., Berger, T., Taddei, K., Martins, I. J., Lim, W. L. F., Singh, S., Wenk, M. R., Ghiso, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2010-100141 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers
Molinuevo, J. L., Ayton, S., Batrla, R., Bednar, M. M., Bittner, T., Cummings, J., Fagan, A. M., Hampel, H., Mielke, M. M., Mikulskis, A., et al. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1932-x · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Palmqvist, S., Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., Karl, J., Zink, K., Bittner, T., Mattsson, N., Eichenlaub, U., Blennow, K., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1632 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, H. J., Park, K. W., Kim, T. E., Im, J. Y., Shin, H. S., Kim, S., Lee, D. H., Ye, B. S., Kim, J. H., Kim, E.-J., Park, K. H., Han, H. J., Jeong, J. H., Choi, S. H., & Park, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon (KR)
- Gachon University (KR)
- Yonsei University (KR)
- National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (KR)
- Pusan National University Hospital (KR)
- Seonam University (KR)
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- Inha University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Sun Ah
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-10-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1043-1050
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1951070310
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- content.iospress.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Korea Health Industry Development Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Keywords
- plasma amyloid-beta
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Albumins, Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Serum Albumin, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Age of Onset, Area Under Curve, Apolipoprotein E4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review