Cited by 48Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow in Mild Cognitive Impairment Assessed Using Phase-Contrast MRI

de Eulate, Reyes García, Goñi, Irene, Galiano, Alvaro, Vidorreta, Marta, Recio, Miriam, Riverol, Mario, Zubieta, José L., Fernández-Seara, María A.·2017·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

There is increasing evidence of a vascular contribution to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In some cases, prior work suggests that chronic brain hypoperfusion could play a prime pathogenic role contributing to the accumulation of amyloid-β,while other studies favor the hypothesis that vascular dysfunction and amyloid pathology are independent, although synergistic, mechanisms contributing to cognitive impairment. Vascular dysfunction can be evaluated by assessing cerebral blood flow impairment. Phase contrast velocity mapping by MRI offers a non-invasive means of quantifying the total inflow of blood to the brain. This quantitative parameter could be a sensitive indicator of vascular disease at early stages of AD. In this work, phase contrast MRI was used to evaluate cerebral hemodynamics in patients with subjective memory complaints, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and mild to moderate AD, and compare them with control subjects. Results showed that blood flow and velocity were decreased in the patients with cognitive dysfunction and the decrease correlated with the degree of cognitive impairment as assessed by means of neuropsychological tests. Total cerebral blood flow measurements were clearly reduced in AD patients, but more importantly appeared to be sensitive enough to distinguish between healthy subjects and those with mild cognitive impairment. A quantitative measurement of total brain blood flow could potentially predict vascular dysfunction and compromised brain perfusion in early stages of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-161222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 48

Authors
de Eulate, R. G., Goñi, I., Galiano, A., Vidorreta, M., Recio, M., Riverol, M., Zubieta, J. L., & Fernández-Seara, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2017-04-25
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
585-595
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2609519280
Cited by
48
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
cerebral blood flow, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Chi-Square Distribution, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review