Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow in Mild Cognitive Impairment Assessed Using Phase-Contrast MRI
Abstract
There is increasing evidence of a vascular contribution to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In some cases, prior work suggests that chronic brain hypoperfusion could play a prime pathogenic role contributing to the accumulation of amyloid-β,while other studies favor the hypothesis that vascular dysfunction and amyloid pathology are independent, although synergistic, mechanisms contributing to cognitive impairment. Vascular dysfunction can be evaluated by assessing cerebral blood flow impairment. Phase contrast velocity mapping by MRI offers a non-invasive means of quantifying the total inflow of blood to the brain. This quantitative parameter could be a sensitive indicator of vascular disease at early stages of AD. In this work, phase contrast MRI was used to evaluate cerebral hemodynamics in patients with subjective memory complaints, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and mild to moderate AD, and compare them with control subjects. Results showed that blood flow and velocity were decreased in the patients with cognitive dysfunction and the decrease correlated with the degree of cognitive impairment as assessed by means of neuropsychological tests. Total cerebral blood flow measurements were clearly reduced in AD patients, but more importantly appeared to be sensitive enough to distinguish between healthy subjects and those with mild cognitive impairment. A quantitative measurement of total brain blood flow could potentially predict vascular dysfunction and compromised brain perfusion in early stages of AD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No differences in total blood flow between individuals with subjective cognitive decline and healthy controls were observed.
“while de Eulate et al. did not observe any differences in total blood flow between individuals with SCD and HCs [163].”
From Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [163]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- de Eulate, R. G., Goñi, I., Galiano, A., Vidorreta, M., Recio, M., Riverol, M., Zubieta, J. L., & Fernández-Seara, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-04-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 585-595
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W2609519280
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- cerebral blood flow, mild cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Chi-Square Distribution, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review