Cited by 83Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Correlates of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Older Adults

Open access
Flatt, Jason D., Johnson, Julene K., Karpiak, Stephen E., Seidel, Liz, Larson, Britta, Brennan-Ing, Mark·2018·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Little is known about subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults. Objectives: To examine SCD and its association with dementia risk factors, other physical and psychosocial health factors in LGBT older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study of SCD was conducted with LGBT older adults, aged 50 and older ( n = 210). SCD was categorized based on endorsement of memory problems and one other cognitive domain. Hierarchical logistic regression examined the associations between demographic factors, dementia risk factors, other health and psychosocial factors, and SCD. Results: Nearly 25% of LGBT older adults were classified as having SCD. LGBT older adults who were people of color (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.1– 7.8), depressed (OR = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.3– 6.9), or reported having functional impairment (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.1– 6.5) were significantly more likely to be classified as having SCD (Nagelkerke pseudo R 2 = 0.27). Conclusion: Depression and functional impairment should be considered when screening LGBT older adults for cognitive impairment and dementia. Future research on the cognitive impairment and dementia risk in LGBT older adults is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-171061

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study showed that SGM older adults who were experiencing depression were more likely to have dementia than their non-SGM peers.

    “One study showed that SGM older adults who were experiencing depression were more likely to have dementia than their non-SGM peers.”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [330]

    The Results report that LGBT older adults with greater depressive symptoms had higher odds of subjective cognitive decline. The Discussion says further research is needed on dementia risk in this population; the study does not show that depressed SGM older adults were more likely to have dementia than non-SGM peers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SGM older adults who were experiencing depression were more likely to report subjective cognitive decline than SGM older adults without depression.

    “One study showed that SGM older adults who were experiencing depression were more likely to report subjective cognitive decline than SGM older adults without depression.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [358]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 83

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Medicine Io (2011) National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Authors
Flatt, J. D., Johnson, J. K., Karpiak, S. E., Seidel, L., Larson, B., & Brennan-Ing, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Gay Men's Health Crisis (US)
  • Center on Halsted, Chicago, IL, USA
  • New York University College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
Corresponding author
Flatt, Jason D.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-05-31
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
91-102
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2806823959
Cited by
83
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001870)
  • University of California, San Francisco (P30 AG044281)
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG056669, P30AG015272, P30AG044281)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
subjective cognitive decline, LGBT older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Bisexuality, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Logistic Models, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review