Regional Neuropeptide Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease: Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Somatostatin
Abstract
Background: the neuropeptides most consistently reported to be altered in Alzheimer’s disease are corticotropin-releasing factor and somatostatin (somatotropin-release inhibiting factor), although this has been previously assessed in a limited number of brain regions. Methods: in order to comprehensively characterize the involvement of these two anatomically distinct neuropeptide systems in Alzheimer’s disease and to determine if they are equally involved in the associated pathology, we measured the concentration of corticotropin-releasing factor and somatostatin in post-mortem brain tissue. Radioimmunoassay of 24 cortical and 13 sub-cortical brain regions from 16 cases of neuropathologically confirmed AD and 9 non-Alzheimer’s disease controls were performed and significant differences in group regional neuropeptide concentrations were sought using the Student Newman-Keuls test after ANOVA. Results: comparison of group mean regional neuropeptide concentrations revealed several brain regions where both peptides were decreased in Alzheimer’s disease and some regions where only one of the two peptides were decreased, while still other regions exhibited no changes in either peptide. These changes were principally found in frontal and temporal cortex, with few subcortical regions exhibiting pathologic changes in peptide concentration. Regional peptide content was correlated among peptides and with duration of dementia in several brain regions. Conclusions: these data support the hypothesis that the somatostatin- and corticotropin-releasing factor containing neurons are pathologically involved in AD and that the involved neurons are limited to specific areas of the brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SST levels are persistently reduced in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients.
“Research has also shown a persistent reduction in SST levels in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients (Bissette et al. 1998;Nilsson et al. 2001)”
From Changes of the Primary Cilia in Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis (2025) · cites this paper as Bissette et al. 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Changes of the Primary Cilia in Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis
Guo, A., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Huang, H. (2025) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70125 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bissette, G., Cook, L., Smith, W., Dole, K. C., Crain, B., & Nemeroff, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-105
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W818781049
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, corticotropin-releasing factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review