Cited by 499Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Brain reserve hypothesis in dementia

Fratiglioni, Laura, Wang, Hui-Xin·2007·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

The concept of brain reserve refers to the ability to tolerate the age-related changes and the disease related pathology in the brain without developing clear clinical symptoms or signs. A considerable body of biological research has documented that a number of factors including education, work complexity, social network, and leisure activities may contribute to this reserve allowing cognitive function to be maintained in old ages. Epidemiological studies have also related these factors to the development of dementia, suggesting that intellectual challenges experienced across the whole life span may increase the brain reserve and be crucial for the occurrence of dementia symptoms in late life. This paper is a systematic review of the published epidemiological studies on this topic. The availability of numerous epidemiological and biological data investigating the reserve hypothesis in dementia permits some preliminary conclusions. High education, adult-life occupational work complexity, as well as a mentally and socially integrated lifestyle in late life could postpone the onset of clinical dementia and AD. The relevance of physical activity itself remains in debate, as most physical activities include also social and mental stimulation. Leisure activities with all three components--physical, mental and social--seem to have the most beneficial effect. Delaying dementia onset by five years would halve dementia prevalence and substantially decrease the number of dementia cases in the community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2007-12103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Good social interactions may be more beneficial to cognition in individuals with low mid-life reserve, as measured by occupational complexity.

    “This suggests that good social interactions may be more beneficial to cognition in individuals with low mid-life reserve, as measured by occupational complexity [27, 41].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 499

Authors
Fratiglioni, L., & Wang, H.-X.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Fratiglioni, Laura
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2007-08-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
11-22
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1929876078
Cited by
499
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
dementia
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Dementia, Educational Status, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Support, Workplace, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review