Cited by 372Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Incidence of dementia is increased in type 2 diabetes and reduced by the use of sulfonylureas and metformin

Hsu, Chih-Cheng, Wahlqvist, Mark L., Lee, Meei-Shyuan, Tsai, Hsin-Ni·2011·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

To determine incidence of dementia in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients, and whether there are adverse or favorable effects of oral agents (OA) in DM, we obtained a representative cohort of 800,000 from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database. Those who, as of on January 1, 2000, were 50 years or older and dementia free (n = 127,209) were followed until December 31, 2007, in relation to absence (n = 101,816) or presence (n = 25,393) of T2DM, and whether any OA was used. Dementia was ascertained by ICD9-CM or A-code. Dementia incidence densities (DID) and fully adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate association between dementia, DM, and OA. Notably, DID (per 10,000 person-years)was markedly increased with DM (without medication), compared to DM free subjects (119 versus 46). Using non-DM as reference, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval) for DM without and with OA were 2.41 (2.17–2.66) and 1.62 (1.49–1.77), respectively. For T2DM, compared with no medication, sulfonylureas alone reduced the HR from 1 to 0.85 (0.71–1.01), metformin alone to 0.76 (0.58–0.98), while with combined oral therapy the HR was 0.65 (0.56–0.74). Adjustments included cerebrovascular diseases so that non-stroke related dementias were found to be decreased in DM with sulfonylurea and metformin therapy. T2DM increases the risk of dementia more than 2-fold. On the other hand, sulfonylureas may decrease the risk of dementia, as does metformin; together, these 2 OAs decrease the risk of dementia in T2DM patients by 35% over 8 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2011-101524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 372

Authors
Hsu, C.-C., Wahlqvist, M. L., Lee, M.-S., & Tsai, H.-N.
Affiliations
  • National Health Research Institutes (TW)
  • National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
485-493
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1553669285
Cited by
372
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
dementia, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insurance, Health, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Taiwan, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review