Incidence of dementia is increased in type 2 diabetes and reduced by the use of sulfonylureas and metformin
Abstract
To determine incidence of dementia in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients, and whether there are adverse or favorable effects of oral agents (OA) in DM, we obtained a representative cohort of 800,000 from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database. Those who, as of on January 1, 2000, were 50 years or older and dementia free (n = 127,209) were followed until December 31, 2007, in relation to absence (n = 101,816) or presence (n = 25,393) of T2DM, and whether any OA was used. Dementia was ascertained by ICD9-CM or A-code. Dementia incidence densities (DID) and fully adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate association between dementia, DM, and OA. Notably, DID (per 10,000 person-years)was markedly increased with DM (without medication), compared to DM free subjects (119 versus 46). Using non-DM as reference, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval) for DM without and with OA were 2.41 (2.17–2.66) and 1.62 (1.49–1.77), respectively. For T2DM, compared with no medication, sulfonylureas alone reduced the HR from 1 to 0.85 (0.71–1.01), metformin alone to 0.76 (0.58–0.98), while with combined oral therapy the HR was 0.65 (0.56–0.74). Adjustments included cerebrovascular diseases so that non-stroke related dementias were found to be decreased in DM with sulfonylurea and metformin therapy. T2DM increases the risk of dementia more than 2-fold. On the other hand, sulfonylureas may decrease the risk of dementia, as does metformin; together, these 2 OAs decrease the risk of dementia in T2DM patients by 35% over 8 years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two retrospective studies reported that among persons with T2D, a diagnosis of dementia was associated with metformin use.
“two retrospective studies reported that among persons with T2D, a diagnosis of dementia was associated with metformin use[85, 86].”
From Metformin in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results of a Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial (2016) · cites this paper as [86]
A recent study suggests metformin and sulfonylureas may decrease the risk of dementia.
“a recent study suggests MET and sulfonylureas (SUs) may decrease the risk of dementia (15)”
From Type 2 Diabetes and Antidiabetic Medications in Relation to Dementia Diagnosis (2014) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 372
- Authors
- Hsu, C.-C., Wahlqvist, M. L., Lee, M.-S., & Tsai, H.-N.
- Affiliations
- National Health Research Institutes (TW)
- National Defense Medical Center (TW)
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 485-493
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W1553669285
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Keywords
- dementia, type 2 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insurance, Health, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Taiwan, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review