Maternal family history is associated with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
A family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD) increases one's risk of developing late-onset AD (LOAD), and a maternal family history of LOAD influences risk more than a paternal family history. Accumulating evidence suggests that a family history of dementia associates with AD-typical biomarker changes. We analyzed cross-sectional data from non-demented, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and LOAD participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with PET imaging using Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB, n = 99) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis (n = 403) for amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) and total tau. We assessed the relationship of CSF and PiB biomarkers and family history of dementia, as well as parent gender effects. In the larger analysis of CSF biomarkers, we assessed diagnosis groups individually. In the overall sample, CSF Aβ, tau/Aβ ratio, and global PiB uptake were significantly different between family history positive and negative groups, with markers of increased AD burden associated with a positive maternal family history of dementia. Moreover, a maternal family history of dementia was associated with significantly greater PiB Aβ load in the brain in the parietal cortex, precuneus, and sensorimotor cortex. Individuals with MCI positive for a maternal family history of dementia had significantly more markers of AD pathophysiology than individuals with no family history of dementia. A family history of dementia is associated with AD-typical biomarker changes. These biomarker associations are most robust in individuals with a maternal family history, suggesting that a maternally inherited factor influences AD risk.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitively intact children of AD mothers, relative to children of AD fathers, show greater age-associated brain atrophy, faster longitudinal brain atrophy, increased Aβ plaque deposition, elevated CSF oxidative stress markers, and AD-like CSF Aβ changes.
“Subsequent studies found that the cognitively intact children of AD mothers, relative to the cognitively intact children of AD fathers, show greater degrees of age-associated brain atrophy, faster rates of longitudinal brain atrophy, increased Aβ plaque deposition, elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oxidative stress markers, and AD-like CSF Aβ changes [130-137].”
From The Alzheimer’s disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis: progress and perspectives (2014) · cites this paper as [137]
Maternal inheritance appears to determine several AD endophenotypes.
“Maternal inheritance appears to determine several AD endophenotypes.”
From The Alzheimer’s disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis: progress and perspectives (2014) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 79
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]Honea RA Swerdlow RH Vidoni ED Burns JM 2010 Progressive regional atrophy in normal adults with a maternal history of Alzheimer disease Neurology 76 822 829 21357834 PMC3053329
- Authors
- Honea, R. A., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Vidoni, E. D., Swerdlow, R. H., & Burns, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Honea, Robyn A.
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 659-668
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- PMC
- PMC3608420
- OpenAlex
- W1535739372
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, P30AG010129, K01AG035042, P30AG035982, U19AG010483)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR033179, KL2RR033177)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, family history of dementia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mothers, Thiazoles, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review