Cited by 109Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Sex Differences in Behavior and Molecular Pathology in the 5XFAD Model

Open access
Sil, Annesha, Erfani, Arina, Lamb, Nicola, Copland, Rachel, Riedel, Gernot, Platt, Bettina·2022·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is greater in women compared to men, but the reasons for this remain unknown. This sex difference has been widely neglected in experimental studies using transgenic mouse models of AD. Objective: Here, we studied behavior and molecular pathology of 5-month-old 5XFAD mice, which express mutated human amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1 on a C57BL/6J background, versus their wild-type littermate controls, to compare both sex- and genotype-dependent differences. Methods: A novel behavioral paradigm was utilized (OF-NO-SI), comprising activity measures (Open Field, OF) arena, followed by Novel Object exploration (NO) and Social Interaction (SI) of a sex-matched conspecific. Each segment consisted of two repeated trials to assess between-trial habituation. Subsequently, brain pathology (amyloid load, stress response and inflammation markers, synaptic integrity, trophic support) was assessed using qPCR and western blotting. Results: Female 5XFAD mice had higher levels of human APP and amyloid-β and heightened inflammation versus males. These markers correlated with hyperactivity observed in both sexes, yet only female 5XFAD mice presented with subtle deficits in object and social exploration. Male animals had higher expression of stress markers and neurotrophic factors irrespective of genotype, this correlated with cognitive performance. Conclusion: The impact of sex on AD-relevant phenotypes is in line with human data and emphasizes the necessity of appropriate study design and reporting. Differential molecular profiles observed in male versus female mice offer insights into possible protective mechanisms, and hence treatment strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-210523

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Prince M, Knapp M, Guerchet M, McCrone P, Prina M, Comas-Herrera A, Wittenberg R, Adelaja B, Hu B, King D, Rehill A, Salimkumar D (2014) Dementia UK: Second Edition -Overview, Alzheimer's Society.
  2. Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, Abbasi N, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, Aichour MTE, Akinyemi RO, Alahdab F, Asgedom SW, Awasthi A, Barker-Collo SL, Baune BT, Béjot Y, Belachew AB, Bennett DA, Biadgo B, Bijani A, Bin Sayeed MS, Brayne C, Carpenter DO, Carvalho F, Catalá-López F, Cerin E, Choi J-YJ, Dang AK, Degefa MG, Djalalinia S, Dubey M, Duken EE, Edvardsson D, Endres M, Eskandarieh S, Faro A, Farzadfar F, Fereshtehnejad S-M, Fernandes E, Filip I, Fischer F, Gebre AK, Geremew D, Ghasemi-Kasman M, Gnedovskaya E V., Gupta R, Hachinski V, Hagos TB, Hamidi S, Hankey GJ, Haro JM, Hay SI, Irvani SSN, Jha RP, Jonas JB, Kalani R, Karch A, Kasaeian A, Khader YS, Khalil IA, Khan EA, Khanna T, Khoja TAM, Khubchandani J, Kisa A, Kissimova-Skarbek K, Kivimäki was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  3. was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  4. Singhal G, Jaehne EJ, Corrigan F, Toben C, Baune BT (2014) Inflammasomes in neuroinflammation and changes in brain function: a focused review. Front Neurosci 8,.
  5. was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  6. was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  7. was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  8. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
  9. Vollert J, Schenker E, Macleod M, Bespalov A, Wuerbel H, Michel M, Dirnagl U, Potschka H, Waldron A-M, Wever K, Steckler T, van de Casteele T, Altevogt B, Sil A, Rice ASC (2020) Systematic review of guidelines for internal validity in the design, conduct and analysis of preclinical biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals. BMJ Open Sci 4,.
  10. Jiao S-S, Bu X-L, Liu Y-H, Zhu C, Wang Q-H, Shen L-L, Liu C-H, Wang Y-R, Yao X-Q, Wang Y-J (2016) was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.440396 doi: bioRxiv preprint and presenilin-1 mutant transgenes. Brain Res 1017, 130-136. · DOI
  11. was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.440396 doi: bioRxiv preprint · DOI
  12. Wong HR (1999) Heat shock proteins. Facts, thoughts, and dreams. A. De Maio. Shock 11:1-12, was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.440396 doi: bioRxiv preprint 1999. Shock 12, 323-5. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sil, A., Erfani, A., Lamb, N., Copland, R., Riedel, G., & Platt, B.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Platt, Bettina
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
755-778
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W3213055664
Cited by
109
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
sex differences, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Sex Characteristics, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice, Presenilin-1, Pathology, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review