The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic analysis of malware behavior using machine learning
Abstract
Malicious software – so called malware – poses a major threat to the security of computer systems. The amount and diversity of its variants render classic security defenses ineffective, such that millions of hosts in the Internet are infected with malware in the form of computer viruses, Internet worms and Trojan horses. While obfuscation and polymorphism employed by malware largely impede detection at file level, the dynamic analysis of malware binaries during run-time provides an instrument for characterizing and defending against the threat of malicious software. In this article, we propose a framework for the automatic analysis of malware behavior using machine learning. The framework allows for automatically identifying novel classes of malware with similar behavior (clustering) and assigning unknown malware to these discovered classes (classification). Based on both, clustering and classification, we propose an incremental approach for behavior-based analysis, capable of processing the behavior of thousands of malware binaries on a daily basis. The incremental analysis significantly reduces the run-time overhead of current analysis methods, while providing accurate discovery and discrimination of novel malware variants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A vector space model for automatic indexing
Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C. S. (1975) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/361219.361220 · Cited by 7,521
Cited by
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence
Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577 · Cited by 637
A survey on technical threat intelligence in the age of sophisticated cyber attacks
Tounsi, W., & Rais, H. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.09.001 · Cited by 474
Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain
Rosenberg, I., Shabtai, A., Elovici, Y., & Rokach, L. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3453158 · Cited by 295
Information security breaches due to ransomware attacks - a systematic literature review
Reshmi, T. R. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100013 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Rieck, K., Trinius, P., Willems, C., & Holz, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Security
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639-668
- ISSN
- 0926-227X (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8924
- OpenAlex
- W1851403712
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 49.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic analysis of malware behavior using machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/jcs-2010-0410
- The paper
- Rieck, K., Trinius, P., Willems, C., & Holz, T. (2011). Automatic analysis of malware behavior using machine learning. Journal of Computer Security. https://doi.org/10.3233/jcs-2010-0410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.