Continuous monitoring of turning in Parkinson’s disease: Rehabilitation potential
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Difficulty turning during gait is a major contributor to mobility disability, falls and reduced quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Unfortunately, the assessment of mobility in the clinic may not adequately reflect typical mobility function or its variability during daily life. We hypothesized that quality of turning mobility, rather than overall quantity of activity, would be impaired in people with PD over seven days of continuous recording. METHODS: Thirteen subjects with PD and 8 healthy control subjects of similar age wore three Opal inertial sensors (on their belt and on each foot) throughout seven consecutive days during normal daily activities. Turning metrics included average and coefficient of variation (CV) of: (1) number of turns per hour, (2) turn angle amplitude, (3) turn duration, (4) turn mean velocity, and (5) number of steps per turn. Turning characteristics during continuous monitoring were compared with turning 90 and 180 degrees in a observed gait task. RESULTS: No differences were found between PD and control groups for observed turns. In contrast, subjects with PD showed impaired quality of turning compared to healthy control subjects (Turn Mean Velocity: 43.3 ± 4.8°/s versus 38 ± 5.7°/s, mean number of steps 1.7 ± 1.1 versus 3.2 ± 0.8). In addition, PD patients showed higher variability within the day and across days compared to controls. However, no differences were seen between PD and control subjects in the overall activity (number of steps per day or percent of the day walking) during the seven days. CONCLUSIONS: We show that continuous monitoring of natural turning during daily activities inside or outside the home is feasible for patients with PD and the elderly. This is the first study showing that continuous monitoring of turning was more sensitive to PD than observed turns. In addition, the quality of turning characteristics was more sensitive to PD than quantity of turns. Characterizing functional turning during daily activities will address a critical barrier to rehabilitation practice and clinical trials: objective measures of mobility characteristics in real-life environments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The present findings are in line with other studies measuring remote physical activity in PD, which were traditionally performed over shorter timeframes (i.e., 1 day to 1 week).
“The present findings are also in line with other studies measuring remote physical activity in PD, which were traditionally performed over shorter timeframes (i.e., 1 day to 1 week).”
From Evaluation of smartphone‐based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson's disease clinical trial (2018) · cites this paper as [70]
These reported significantly less motor activity in PD compared to controls (e.g., fewer steps and shorter bouts of physical activity), some of which were related to disease severity.
“These reported significantly less motor activity in PD compared to controls (e.g., fewer steps and shorter bouts of physical activity,48, 70) some of which were related to disease severity71”
From Evaluation of smartphone‐based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson's disease clinical trial (2018) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 175
- Authors
- Mancini, M., El-Gohary, M., Pearson, S., McNames, J., Schlueter, H., Nutt, J. G., King, L. A., & Horak, F. B.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- APDM, Inc., Portland, OR, USA
- APDM (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mancini, Martina
- Venue
- NeuroRehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-08-22
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-10
- ISSN
- 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-6448
- PMC
- PMC4745985
- OpenAlex
- W2267564478
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 43.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX001075)
- Oregon Health and Science University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R41NS076088)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, gait, inertial sensors, wearable sensors, continuous monitoring, daily activities, falls, rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Case-Control Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Remote Sensing Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review