Cited by 329Neuroscience and Music PerceptionTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The plastic human brain

Jäncke, Lutz·2009·Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this review I summarize and discuss reported findings of structural and functional plasticity in the intact human brain. METHODS: The main focus is placed on research that uses musicians as a model to study brain plasticity. I summarize therefore mostly studies dealing with musicians or with the effect of music practice. In the first section, structural plasticity is described on the basis of modern neuroanatomical studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In the second part, emphasis is given to studies reporting functional plasticity on the basis of changed neurophysiological activation patterns. These studies are discussed in the context of two approaches employed to study plasticity in the human brain: the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. RESULTS: The reviewed studies altogether indicate that experience can shape brain anatomy and brain physiology. Brain plasticity as demonstrated here is related to changed grey and white mater densities (and volumes) but also to changed activation patterns in the brain areas involved in controlling the expertise task. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, all studies support the view that the human brain is much more plastic than had been anticipated 20 years ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/rnn-2009-0519

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The last decade of neuroimaging has shown that the brain is highly plastic, in particular in childhood/adolescence, when it is still developing.

    “The last decade of neuroimaging has shown that the brain is highly plastic, in particular in childhood/adolescence, when it is still developing (Rapoport and Gogtay, 2008; Jäncke, 2009).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 329

Authors
Jäncke, L.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Jäncke, Lutz
Venue
Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience
Published
2009-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
521-538
ISSN
  • 0922-6028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-3627
OpenAlex
W1506973712
Cited by
329
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
neuroplasticity, structural plasticity, functional plasticity, musicians, music practice, expertise, gray matter density, white matter density, brain activation patterns
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Neuronal Plasticity, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review