The plastic human brain
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this review I summarize and discuss reported findings of structural and functional plasticity in the intact human brain. METHODS: The main focus is placed on research that uses musicians as a model to study brain plasticity. I summarize therefore mostly studies dealing with musicians or with the effect of music practice. In the first section, structural plasticity is described on the basis of modern neuroanatomical studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In the second part, emphasis is given to studies reporting functional plasticity on the basis of changed neurophysiological activation patterns. These studies are discussed in the context of two approaches employed to study plasticity in the human brain: the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. RESULTS: The reviewed studies altogether indicate that experience can shape brain anatomy and brain physiology. Brain plasticity as demonstrated here is related to changed grey and white mater densities (and volumes) but also to changed activation patterns in the brain areas involved in controlling the expertise task. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, all studies support the view that the human brain is much more plastic than had been anticipated 20 years ago.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The last decade of neuroimaging has shown that the brain is highly plastic, in particular in childhood/adolescence, when it is still developing.
“The last decade of neuroimaging has shown that the brain is highly plastic, in particular in childhood/adolescence, when it is still developing (Rapoport and Gogtay, 2008; Jäncke, 2009).”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Jäncke, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 329
- Authors
- Jäncke, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Jäncke, Lutz
- ORCID
- Jäncke, Lutz
- Venue
- Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-538
- ISSN
- 0922-6028 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-3627
- OpenAlex
- W1506973712
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- neuroplasticity, structural plasticity, functional plasticity, musicians, music practice, expertise, gray matter density, white matter density, brain activation patterns
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Neuronal Plasticity, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review