Using Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning to Predict Postpartum Depression
Open accessAbstract
Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most frequent maternal morbidities after delivery with serious implications. Currently, there is a lack of effective screening strategies and high-quality clinical trials. The ability to leverage a large amount of detailed patient data from electronic health records (EHRs) to predict PPD could enable the implementation of effective clinical decision support interventions. To develop a PPD prediction model, using EHRs from Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital between 2015-17, 9,980 episodes of pregnancy were identified. Six machine learning algorithms, including L2-regularized Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, XGBoost, and Random forest were constructed. Our model's best prediction performance achieved an AUC of 0.79. Race, obesity, anxiety, depression, different types of pain, antidepressants, and anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy were among the significant predictors. Our results suggest a potential for applying machine learning to EHR data to predict PPD and inform healthcare delivery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In prior studies predicting PPD risk, history of depression drives much of the discriminatory performance.
“Prior studies predicting PPD risk have achieved further improved discriminatory ability (AUCs of 0.80–0.90) but have limitations related to generalizability [54, 55] and the finding that history of depression drives much of the discriminatory performance [54, 56].”
From Factors associated with postpartum depression symptoms following antepartum hospitalization (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 99
- Authors
- Shuojia, W., Jyotishman, P., & Yiye, Z.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 264
- Pages
- 888-892
- ISSN
- 0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2984882139
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 59.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, electronic health records, machine learning prediction, clinical decision support, maternal health, pregnancy, risk factors, antidepressants, anti-inflammatory agents, obesity, anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Depression, Postpartum, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review