“I don't know about the past or the future, but today it's Friday” – Evaluation of a time aid for people with dementia
Abstract
As dementia progresses problems in distinguishing and perceiving dates, days of the week, and the time of day becomes more difficult. As a consequence the person with dementia can become more disorientated in time, missing appointments, doing things
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Topo, P., Saarikalle, K., Begley, E., Cahill, S., Holthe, T., & Macijauskiene, J.
- Affiliations
- National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland
- St. James's Hospital (IE)
- Norwegian Centre for Dementia Research, Tønsberg, Norway
- Kaunas University of Medicine, Geriatric Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Venue
- Technology and Disability
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04-13
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 121-131
- ISSN
- 1055-4181 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-643X
- OpenAlex
- W2169909231
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technology and Disability (publishedVersion)
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- dementia, time perception, appointment keeping, assistive technology evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
