The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present a participatory evaluation of an actual "smart home" project implemented in an independent retirement facility. Using the participatory evaluation process, residents guided the research team through development and implementation of the initial phase of a smart home project designed to assist residents to remain functionally independent and age in place. We recruited nine residents who provided permission to install the technology in their apartments. We conducted a total of 75 interviews and three observational sessions. Residents expressed overall positive perceptions of the sensor technologies and did not feel that these interfered with their daily activities. The process of adoption and acceptance of the sensors included three phases, familiarization, adjustment and curiosity, and full integration. Residents did not express privacy concerns. They provided detailed feedback and suggestions that were integrated into the redesign of the system. They also reported a sense of control resulting from their active involvement in the evaluation process. Observational sessions confirmed that the sensors were not noticeable and residents did not change their routines. The participatory evaluation approach not only empowers end-users but it also allows for the implementation of smart home systems that address residents' needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining Obtrusiveness in Home Telehealth Technologies: A Conceptual Framework
Hensel, B. K., Demiris, G., & Courtney, K. L. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2026 · Cited by 180
Self-citation
Cited by
Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 · Cited by 1,121
A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015 · Cited by 718
A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Healthcare
Acampora, G., Cook, D. J., Rashidi, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2013.2262913 · Cited by 630
Inclusion of older adults in the research and design of digital technology
Mannheim, I., Schwartz, E., Xi, W., Buttigieg, S. C., McDonnell-Naughton, M., Wouters, E. J. M., & van Zaalen, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16193718 · Cited by 291
Zwijsen, S. A., Niemeijer, A. R., & Hertogh, C. M. P. M. (2011) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.543662 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Demiris, G., Oliver, D. P., Dickey, G., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M.
- Venue
- Technology and Health Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 0928-7329 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-7401
- OpenAlex
- W2153536173
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/thc-2008-16205
- The paper
- Demiris, G., Oliver, D. P., Dickey, G., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M. (2008). Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technology and Health Care. https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-2008-16205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.