Cited by 1Medical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchOccupational Health and Performance

Psychosocial factors related to returning to work in U.S. Army Soldiers

Julian, Christopher H., Valente, Juliana M.·2015·Work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Work provides daily structure, physical and mental activity, interpersonal contact, social status, self-esteem, respect of others, and the ability to use acquired skills. Wounded, ill, or injured soldiers are often removed from duty and assigned or attached to a Warrior Transition Unit during medical and rehabilitation management. Separation from meaningful employment can lead to negative physical and behavioral health outcomes that may impact an active duty soldier's ability to resume work. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study explored the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) psychosocial factors of Personal Causation, Values, Interests, Roles, Habits, and Perceptions of Environment related to returning to work in US Army Soldiers in a Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) at a large military medical center. METHODS: Single data collection sessions were held for 34 soldiers using the following instruments: a demographic and work status questionnaire, the Role Checklist, and the Worker Role Interview (WRI). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square analysis, and the Mann Whitney U test were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that one WRI item related to Personal Causation and three items related to Roles and Habits were supportive factors for successfully returning to employment among soldiers that were working or engaged in returning to work. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences among psychosocial factors related to returning to work between soldiers who are currently working or have returned to work and those who have not. Longitudinal studies could help to clarify how these factors augment a soldier's rehabilitation at a WTU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-152113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 1

Authors
Julian, C. H., & Valente, J. M.
Affiliations
United States Army (US)
Corresponding author
Julian, Christopher H.
Venue
Work
Published
2015-08-05
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
419-431
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W1914944440
Cited by
1
References
38
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • U.S. Department of Labor
  • U.S. Army Medical Department
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
return to work, Model of Human Occupation, psychosocial factors, wounded soldiers, military rehabilitation, personal causation, employment effects, U.S. Army soldiers
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Role, United States, Young Adult, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review