Psychosocial factors related to returning to work in U.S. Army Soldiers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Work provides daily structure, physical and mental activity, interpersonal contact, social status, self-esteem, respect of others, and the ability to use acquired skills. Wounded, ill, or injured soldiers are often removed from duty and assigned or attached to a Warrior Transition Unit during medical and rehabilitation management. Separation from meaningful employment can lead to negative physical and behavioral health outcomes that may impact an active duty soldier's ability to resume work. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study explored the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) psychosocial factors of Personal Causation, Values, Interests, Roles, Habits, and Perceptions of Environment related to returning to work in US Army Soldiers in a Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) at a large military medical center. METHODS: Single data collection sessions were held for 34 soldiers using the following instruments: a demographic and work status questionnaire, the Role Checklist, and the Worker Role Interview (WRI). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square analysis, and the Mann Whitney U test were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that one WRI item related to Personal Causation and three items related to Roles and Habits were supportive factors for successfully returning to employment among soldiers that were working or engaged in returning to work. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences among psychosocial factors related to returning to work between soldiers who are currently working or have returned to work and those who have not. Longitudinal studies could help to clarify how these factors augment a soldier's rehabilitation at a WTU.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adapts Routines to Minimize Difficulties was significant at univariate level in a return to work from sickness absence study and has been found to differentiate between employed and unemployed US veterans.
“Adapts Routines to Minimize Difficulties was also significant at univariate level in return to work from sickness absence study [38] and has also been found to differentiate between employed and unemployed US veterans [69].”
From An enhanced individual placement and support (iPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Julian, C. H., & Valente, J. M.
- Affiliations
- United States Army (US)
- Corresponding author
- Julian, Christopher H.
- Venue
- Work
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-08-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 419-431
- ISSN
- 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-9270
- OpenAlex
- W1914944440
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Work (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- U.S. Department of Labor
- U.S. Army Medical Department
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
- Keywords
- return to work, Model of Human Occupation, psychosocial factors, wounded soldiers, military rehabilitation, personal causation, employment effects, U.S. Army soldiers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Role, United States, Young Adult, Return to Work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review