Transforming the meaning of pain: An important step for the return to work
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Previous studies have found illness representations to be associated with the degree to which patients adopt health behaviours. Surprisingly, pain representations, especially those in a work rehabilitation context, have rarely been explored. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a thorough investigation of the pain representations held by workers who were on sick leave due to persistent musculoskeletal pain during the process of an intensive work rehabilitation program. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants (male, female), three times during the program and one month after discharge. Data analysis was based on a narrative approach. RESULTS: Throughout the process, pain representation was an indicator of the type of action the participants were ready to take to control the immediate or possible consequences of their pain. Using the context of a work rehabilitation trajectory we identified the differential impact of reconstruction or status quo in pain representations that eventually led to a return to work, or not. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the importance of identifying and acknowledging workers' pain representations in facilitating their return to work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many workers in a work rehabilitation trajectory were ready to accept the idea that the pain might never disappear and were willing to learn how to deal with this reality.
“Many workers were ready to accept the idea that the pain might never disappear and they were willing to learn how to deal with this reality [49].”
From Staying at work with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study of workers' experiences (2011) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Coutu, M.-F., Baril, R., Durand, M.-J., Côté, D., Rouleau, A., & Cadieux, G.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (CA)
- Venue
- Work
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-219
- ISSN
- 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143036537
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pharesst.irsst.qc.ca
- Locations
- Work (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PhareSST (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pratt and Whitney Canada
- Fondation J. Armand Bombardier
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- representation of pain, illness representations, return to work, vocational rehabilitation, sick leave, chronic musculoskeletal pain, workers, pain management, narrative approach
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Quebec, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Sick Leave, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review