The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testgüte-Vergleich von zwei Instrumenten zur Krankheitsverarbeitung in der kardiologischen Rehabilitation – Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung (TSK) und Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung (FKV): Comparison of two coping questionnaires in cardiological rehabilitation – the ‘Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung’ (TSK) and the ‘Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung’ (FKV)
Abstract
Two common German coping questionnaires, the ‘Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung’ (TSK, Klauer & Filipp, 1993) and the ‘Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung’ (FKV, Muthny, 1989) were compared in a cross-sectional study (including 224 heart patients in rehabilitation). Both questionnaires are multidimensional (5 scales each) and require approx. 15 minutes response time. Internal consistencies (with one exception) were found to be sufficient or good (Cronbach's α from 0.66 to 0.81), those of the TSK (with a greater number of items per scale and items in full sentences) a little bit higher. With respect to concurrent validity the scales of the two questionnaires obviously measure different dimensions (despite some similiar scale names) and show only low to moderate correlations. Substantial relationships of coping scales with outcome criteria like depression, anxiety and rehabilitation status were found for ‘depressive coping’ of the FKV and ‘rumination’ of the TSK. While the TSK show better reliability, the FKV can be applied in self-rating as well as in ratings by experts and relatives and offers more comparative date in a broad spectrum of fields and diseases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Its psychometric properties are well established [55].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ruesch, M., Helmes, A. W., & Bengel, J. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0801-3 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Dörner, U., & Muthny, F. A.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Muthny, Fritz A.
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 125-132
- ISSN
- 0940-5569 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-9246
- OpenAlex
- W1157548457
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie (publishedVersion)
- Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- coping with illness, cardiac rehabilitation, questionnaire comparison, psychometric properties, internal consistency, concurrent validity, depressive coping, rumination, depression, anxiety, rehabilitation outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testgüte-Vergleich von zwei Instrumenten zur Krankheitsverarbeitung in der kardiologischen Rehabilitation – Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung (TSK) und Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung (FKV): Comparison of two coping questionnaires in cardiological rehabilitation – the ‘Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung’ (TSK) and the ‘Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung’ (FKV). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/zmp-2008-17_2-3_10
- The paper
- Dörner, U., & Muthny, F. A. (2008). Testgüte-Vergleich von zwei Instrumenten zur Krankheitsverarbeitung in der kardiologischen Rehabilitation – Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung (TSK) und Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung (FKV): Comparison of two coping questionnaires in cardiological rehabilitation – the ‘Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung’ (TSK) and the ‘Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung’ (FKV). Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.3233/zmp-2008-17_2-3_10