Cited by 86Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesSleep and related disorders

Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Normal Systolic Left Ventricular Function

Open access
Bitter, Thomas, Langer, Christoph, Vogt, Jürgen, Lange, Mathias, Horstkotte, Dieter, Oldenburg, Olaf·2009·Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Abstract

Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is more common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib). Recently, an additional association between central sleep apnea/Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSA/CSR) and AFib has been described. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and type of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with AFib and normal systolic left ventricular function. Methods 150 patients (110 men and 40 women, aged 66.1 +/- 1.7 years) underwent cardiorespiratory polygraphy, capillary blood gas analysis, measurement of NT-proBNP, and echocardiography to determine the diameter of the left atrium (LAD) and the peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). Results Sleep-disordered breathing was documented in 74% of all patients with AFib (43% had OSA and 31% had CSA/CSR). Patients with CSA/CSR had a higher PAP, a higher apnea-hypopnea index, a greater LAD, and a lower capillary blood pCO(2) than patients with OSA. Conclusions Patients with AFib were found to have not only a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea, as has been described previously, but also a high prevalence of CSA/CSR. It remains unknown whether CSA/CSR is more common in AFib because of diastolic dysfunction or whether phenomena associated with CSA/CSR predispose to AFib. Further research on this question is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 86

Authors
Bitter, T., Langer, C., Vogt, J., Lange, M., Horstkotte, D., & Oldenburg, O.
Affiliations
  • Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Published
2009-03-06
Volume
106
Issue
10
Pages
164-70
ISSN
1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124288455
Cited by
86
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Deutsches Ärzteblatt international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, pulmonary artery pressure, left atrium, apnea-hypopnea index, capillary blood gas, NT-proBNP, prevalence
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cheyne-Stokes Respiration, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Incidence, Ventricular Function, Left, Polysomnography, Risk Assessment, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review