The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Withdrawal Phenomena and Dependence Syndrome After the Consumption of „Spice Gold“
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: "Spice" and other herbal blends were marketed in Germany until January 2009 as substances purportedly exerting similar effects to cannabis, yet containing no cannabinoids. These products were recently forbidden in Germany under the provisions of the German Narcotics Law after they were found to contain undeclared, synthetic cannabinomimetic substances. The authors describe physical withdrawal phenomena and a dependence syndrome that developed after the consumption of "Spice." CASE PRESENTATION AND COURSE: A 20-year old patient reported that he had smoked "Spice Gold" daily for 8 months. He developed tolerance and rapidly increased the dose to 3 g per day. He felt a continuous desire for the drug and kept on using it despite the development of persistent cognitive impairment. His substance use led him to neglect his duties in his professional training position. Urinary drug screens were negative on admission to the hospital, as they were again on discharge. On hospital days 4-7, he developed inner unrest, drug craving, nocturnal nightmares, profuse sweating, nausea, tremor, and headache. His blood pressure was elevated for two days, with a maximal value of 180/90 mm Hg accompanied by a heart rate of 125/min. The patient stated that he had experienced a similar syndrome a few weeks earlier during a phase of abstinence owing to a short supply, and that it had quickly subsided after he had started consuming "Spice" once again. CONCLUSIONS: The authors interpret the symptoms and signs described above as a dependence syndrome corresponding to the ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria for this entity. The physical withdrawal syndrome closely resembles that seen in cannabis dependence. The authors postulate that the syndrome in the patient described was due to an admixture of synthetic cannabinomimetics such as JWH-018 and CP 47497 in "Spice Gold," in combination with the patient's daily consumption in very large amounts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synthetic cannabinoids: Epidemiology, pharmacodynamics, and clinical implications
Castaneto, M. S., Gorelick, D. A., Desrosiers, N. A., Hartman, R. L., Pirard, S., & Huestis, M. A. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.005 · Cited by 709
Rosenbaum, C. D., Carreiro, S. P., & Babu, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Medical Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13181-011-0202-2 · Cited by 355
Novel psychoactive substances of interest for psychiatry
Schifano, F., Orsolini, L., Duccio Papanti, G., & Corkery, J. M. (2015) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20174 · Cited by 321
Dresen, S., Ferreirós, N., Pütz, M., Westphal, F., Zimmermann, R., & Auwärter, V. (2010) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1811 · Cited by 309
Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects
Luethi, D., & Liechti, M. E. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02693-7 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, U. S., Winkelmann, P. R., Pilhatsch, M., Nees, J. A., Spanagel, R., & Schulz, K.
- Venue
- Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
- Publisher
- Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
- Published
- 2009-07-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 464-7
- ISSN
- 1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2184025074
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Withdrawal Phenomena and Dependence Syndrome After the Consumption of „Spice Gold“. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0464
- The paper
- Zimmermann, U. S., Winkelmann, P. R., Pilhatsch, M., Nees, J. A., Spanagel, R., & Schulz, K. (2009). Withdrawal Phenomena and Dependence Syndrome After the Consumption of „Spice Gold“. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0464
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.