Cited by 106Pressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Decubitus Ulcers

Open access
Anders, Jennifer, Heinemann, Axel, Leffmann, Carsten, Leutenegger, Maja, Pröfener, Franz, Renteln-Kruse, Wolfgang von·2010·Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Abstract

Background Pressure sores are a serious complication of multimorbidity and lack of mobility. Decubitus ulcers have become rarer among bed-ridden patients because of the conscientious use of pressure-reducing measures and increased mobilization. Nonetheless, not all decubitus ulcers can be considered preventable or potentially curable, because poor circulation makes some patients more susceptible to them, and because cognitive impairment can make prophylactic measures difficult to apply. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in 2004 and 2005 in the setting of a health technology assessment, and a selective literature search was performed in 2009 for papers on the prevention of decubitus ulcers. Results Elderly, multimorbid patients with the immobility syndrome are at high risk for the development of decubitus ulcers, as are paraplegic patients. The most beneficial way to prevent decubitus ulcers, and to treat them once they are present, is to avoid excessive pressure by encouraging movement. At the same time, the risk factors that promote the development of decubitus ulcers should be minimized as far as possible. Conclusions Malnutrition, poor circulation (hypoperfusion), and underlying diseases that impair mobility should be recognized if present and then treated, and accompanying manifestations, such as pain, should be treated symptomatically. Over the patient's further course, the feasibility, implementation, and efficacy of ulcer-preventing measures should b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Micro-mobility and nutrition status are important indicators to estimate the risk profile for decubitus, especially in elder patients, and the ability to change position in bed is essential to avoid it.

    “Micro-mobility (movements in bed) and nutrition status are important indicators to estimate the risk profile for decubitus, especially in elder patients.These patients constitute the single largest group (more than 60%) among all patients with decubitus ulcers (Anders et al. 2010) and their ability to change the position in bed is essential to avoid it (Harris 1996).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anders, J., Heinemann, A., Leffmann, C., Leutenegger, M., Pröfener, F., & Renteln-Kruse, W. V.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Published
2010-05-28
Volume
107
Issue
21
Pages
371-81; quiz 382
ISSN
1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168913114
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Deutsches Ärzteblatt international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
pressure ulcers, pressure ulcer prevention, immobility, bedridden patients, multimorbidity, elderly patients, paraplegia, risk factors, malnutrition, poor circulation, hypoperfusion, cognitive impairment, pressure relief, position change
MeSH terms
Aged, Cooperative Behavior, Pressure Ulcer, Diagnosis, Differential, Germany, Humans, Ischemia, Paraplegia, Primary Prevention, Protein-Energy Malnutrition, Risk Factors, Skin, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Comorbidity, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Interdisciplinary Communication, Mobility Limitation, Patient Positioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review