Cited by 18Healthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessWaste Management and Recycling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LEVERS OF ECO-CONTROL AND GREEN BEHAVIOR IN MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

Open access
Sisdyani, Eka Ardhani, Subroto, Bambang, Saraswati, Erwin, Baridwan, Zaki·2020·International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy

Abstract

This research examines the mediating role of the levers of eco-control on the effect of the green behavior intention on actual behavior, in the context of the management of medical waste. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey method, from a randomly selected sample of 125 top managers of Indonesian public hospitals. The results show that the green behavior intention affects the importance use of the four eco-control mechanisms, namely belief, boundary, diagnostic, and interactive eco-control. However, only boundary and interactive eco-control influence actual green behavior. Furthermore, the indirect effect of the test results shows the role of boundary eco-control in mediating the relationship of green behavior’s intention and green behavior. This means that the stronger the intention is, the more likely that the actual behavior will be realized through the implementation of boundary eco-control. Accordingly, the main implication of the study is that the government should formulate mandatory regulations regarding medical waste’s management. The mandatory nature of the regulation will provide a coercive way to force compliant behavior, as the underlying dimension of the boundary control mechanism. Keywords : behavior, levers of eco-control, management control system, waste management, health-care industry JEL Classifications: Q56, M41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9342

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32479/ijeep.9342

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 80 references

3 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Etzioni, A. (1975), A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, Revised and Enlarged Edition. London: The Free Press, Collier Macmillan Publishers.
  2. Stern, P.C. (2000), Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Sisdyani, E. A., Subroto, B., Saraswati, E., & Baridwan, Z.
Affiliations
  • Udayana University (ID)
  • University of Brawijaya (ID)
Venue
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Publisher
EconJournals
Published
2020-05-15
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
194-204
ISSN
2146-4553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024042531
Cited by
15
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitas Brawijaya
  • Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
medical waste management, ecological control, boundary control, interactive control, diagnostic control, mediating effect, public hospitals, management control systems, health sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review