The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PEMETAAN PENELITIAN ORIENTALIS TERHADAP HADIS MENURUT HARALD MOTZI
Open accessAbstract
This paper focuses on maping hadiths studies which has been done by orientalists according to Harald Motzki. So far, the maping is always seen based on an assuption which results three sections namely sceptic, non-sceptic, and middle ground. Unlike prior studies, Motzki tries to divide hadiths studies in the West based on the method they use Based on it, it is obtained a conclusion that hadiths studies in the West are not stagnant and similiar. On the contrary, it undergoes a progress time by the time. Based on the method employed to examine the authenticity of hadiths. The study of hadith in the West can be classified into four divisions. First, is matan which was introduced by Ignaz Goldziher, Josep Schacht, and Marston Speight. Second, is dating based on collections of hadis books with Josep Schacht as a initiator. Third, is dating by isnad which was started by Josep Schacht and Juynboll. Fourth, is isnad-cum-matan which was embarked by Harald Motzki.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most studies treat Motzki's rebuttal as a decisive victory that settles the matter, as if criticism of Juynboll automatically restores the hadith's full a uthenticity (see Ulummudin, 2020;Ramdhani, 2021).”
From The Deconstruction of the Common Link Theory: Harald Motzki’s Methodological Critique of G.H.A. Juynboll’s Skepticism in Hadith Dating: Kritik Harald Motzki Terhadap Teori Common Link Juynboll (2025) · cites this paper as Ulummudin, 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Faroh, Mar'ah Nailul, Hadis dan Orientalis (Teori Ignaz Gholdziher dan Joseph Schacht). Goldziher, Ignaz, Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law, terj. Andras dan Ruth Hamori Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1981.
- Maizuddin, Book Review: Analisis Isnad Cum Matan: Mengukur Kritik Hadis Muslim dan Barat Kamaruddin Amin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metodologi Kritik Hadis, Penerbit Hikmah: 2009, dalam jurnal Substantia, Vol.18, No. 2. 2016.
- Masrur, Ali, Skeptisisme Ignaz Goldziher (1850-1921) terhadap Autentisitas Hadits dan Berbagai Tanggapannya, dalam jurnal Wawasan, Vol. 34, No. 2. 2011.
- Sumbullah, Umi, Kritik Hadis: Pendekatan Historis dan Metodologis, Malang: UIN Malang Press. 2008.
- Syamsuddin, Sahiron, Pemetaan Penelitian Orientalis Terhadap Hadis", dalam Orientalisme al-Qur'an dan Hadis, ed. Nur Kholis setiawan & Sahiron Syamsuddin, Yogyakarta: Nawesea Press. 2007.
- Zuhri, Muh, Perkembangan Kajian Hadis Kesarjanaan Barat, dalam Ulul Albab Vol. 16, No. 2. 2015.
Cited by
Junus, I. J., Wahyudin, D. M., Najib, M., Masrur, A., & Nur, S. (2025) · Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis · doi:10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.47688 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulummudin
- Venue
- Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
- Publisher
- IAIN Langsa
- Published
- 2020-06-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-104
- ISSN
- 2621-3559 (ISSN-L)
- 2622-7606
- OpenAlex
- W3037523884
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Al-Bukhari Jurnal Ilmu Hadis (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- hadith studies, Orientalism, Harald Motzki, hadith criticism, matn, isnad, Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Schacht
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
