The Politics of Qirā'āt: State Power and The Canonization of Qur'anic Recitation in Early Islam
Open accessAbstract
The study of qira’at in Islam has traditionally centered on linguistic and phonetic dimensions. However, it also intersects significantly with the dynamics of political authority and canon formation in Islamic history. Using a historical-analytical approach, this study examines the role of political power in the codification and standardization of qira’at, focusing on critical episodes such as the compilation of the mushaf under Caliph ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan, administrative interventions during the Umayyad dynasty, and the canonization of the seven qira’at by Ibn Mujahid, later expanded to ten by Ibn al-Jazari. Drawing on classical Islamic sources and contemporary academic literature, the study demonstrates that qira’at orthodoxy was shaped not only by scholarly consensus, but also by strategic political interventions in response to socio-political imperatives. By exploring the intersection of religion, power, and the construction of Qur’anic recitational authority, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how the political construction of religious orthodoxy and the canonization of sacred texts in Islam.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The standardization of the Qur'anic text through the policy of rasm ʿUthmānī marked a crucial moment in the ordering of Qur'anic recitational authority.
“The standardization of the Qur'anic text through the policy of rasm ʿUthmānī was not merely a project to preserve the physical form of the muṣḥaf (written codex); it also marked a crucial moment in the ordering of Qur'anic recitational authority (Khodijah et al., 2025).”
From Kanonisasi Tujuh Bacaan Al-Quran: Ibn Mujahid, Otoritas Keilmuan, dan Rekonfigurasi Epistemologis Qiraat (2026) · cites this paper as Khodijah et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jabar, A., Fauzi, I., Rohmah, U., Falahan, A. A., & Rahim, A. (2026) · Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr · doi:10.24090/xajagr67
- Authors
- Khodijah, S., Muzammil, I., & Rafly Try Ramadhani, M.
- Venue
- Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir
- Publisher
- IAIN Langsa
- Published
- 2025-06-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-36
- ISSN
- 2442-594X (ISSN-L)
- 2579-5708
- OpenAlex
- W6927377400
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Jurnal At-Tibyan Jurnal Ilmu Alqur`an dan Tafsir (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Keywords
- qira'at, Quranic recitation, political authority, state power, Uthman ibn Affan, Umayyad Caliphate, Ibn al-Jazari, religious orthodoxy, early Islamic history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review