Pregnant Women’s Views on the Type of Delivery: Determinants and Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: In recent years, the rate of delivery by Cesarean Section (CS) has increased in many countries.Many factors are responsible for this trend which are beyond the clinical practice of gynecologists.Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate factors related to the preference for delivery type in pregnant women referred to a hospital in Tehran City, Iran. Materials and Methods:This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 pregnant women referred to one of the hospitals in Tehran, in 2016.A questionnaire for determining the women's perspective about the factors associated with the choice of delivery mode was used for data collection.It had two parts; the first part surveyed demographic and obstetric characteristics, and the second part evaluated the preference of pregnant women for delivery type.For analyzing data, the Pearson correlation, the Chi-squared test, and t-test were carried out.Results: The Mean±SD age of the participants was 30.43±4.93 years; 65.8% of them were housewives, and 55.2% had a university education.About 63.5% had not participated in any childbirth education classes.The preferred delivery in 59.28% of the participants was a normal delivery.The correlation test results reported a negative correlation between the scores obtained by pregnant women and their preferred delivery mode (P=0.001,r=-0.6).Furthermore, the t-test results showed a significant difference between the two groups (group in favor of normal delivery and the group in favor of Cesarean Section); those with lower scores (negative views towards normal delivery) preferred CS (P<0.001).The Chi-squared test results reported that women's preference for delivery mode had a significant correlation with their occupation (P=0.042),education (P=0.033),number of children (P=0.001),their first delivery method (P=0.001), and participation in childbirth education classes (P=0.001).In other words, the employed and university student women, those with higher educational level, women with a history of normal delivery and participation in childbirth education classes had a greater tendency toward the normal delivery. Conclusion:The pregnant women's views on the mode of delivery are related to the choice of delivery mode.Education, training, recommendations of phycision and midwife, Spouse, friends, relatives, and maternity preparation classes are directly related to their choice of delivery mode.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An analytical cross-sectional study in Tehran (2016) involving 400 pregnant women found that occupation, education, parity, prior delivery method and participation in childbirth education classes were significantly associated with preference for vaginal delivery.
“An analytical cross-sectional study in Tehran (2016) involving 400 pregnant women found that occupation, education, parity, prior delivery method and participation in childbirth education classes were significantly associated with preference for vaginal delivery.”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
A qualitative study among primiparous women with previous vaginal birth experience identified themes such as 'internal control', 'external control' and 'support' as key determinants of positive or negative childbirth experiences.
“A qualitative study among primiparous women with previous vaginal birth experience identified themes such as ‘internal control’, ‘external control’ and ‘support’ as key determinants of positive or negative childbirth experiences, highlighting the importance of woman-centred care.”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
A mixed-methods systematic review of studies in Iran (1990-2019) included 65 quantitative studies and 26 qualitative studies, revealing that despite low individual preference for caesarean section among nulliparous women, national CS rates remain high (47.9%), reflecting the influence of health professional and system-level factors.
“Furthermore, a mixed-methods systematic review of studies conducted in Iran (1990–2019) included 65 quantitative studies and 26 qualitative studies, revealing that despite low individual preference for caesarean section among nulliparous women, national CS rates remain high (47.9%), reflecting the influence of health professional and system-level factors.4042”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
While several quantitative and qualitative studies have explored delivery preferences in Iran, there is a limited number of mixed-methods studies.
“These studies demonstrate that while several quantitative and qualitative studies have explored delivery preferences in Iran, there is a limited number of mixed-methods studies.”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Understanding how psychological, social and systemic factors interact to influence women's choices remains incomplete.
“Understanding how psychological, social and systemic factors interact to influence women’s choices remains incomplete, underscoring the rationale for the present mixed-methods study.”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Jalali, N., Hadavand, S., Jafari, F., Rabiee, M., & Khajavi Shojaie, K.
- Affiliations
- Shahed University (IR)
- ORCID
- Jafari, Farhad
- Venue
- Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
- Publisher
- Negah Scientific Publisher
- Published
- 2019-06-30
- Pages
- 50-60
- ISSN
- 2251-8460 (ISSN-L)
- 2588-3712
- 2588-3720
- OpenAlex
- W2951188091
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Shahed University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- mode of delivery preference, cesarean section, normal delivery, pregnant women, childbirth education, maternal education, parity, occupation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review