Insider Threat Detection Based on NLP Word Embedding and Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
The growth of edge computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing have been accompanied by new security issues evolving in the information security infrastructure. Recent studies suggest that the cost of insider attacks is higher than the external threats, making it an essential aspect of information security for organizations. Efficient insider threat detection requires state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence models and utility. Although significant have been made to detect insider threats for more than a decade, there are many limitations, including a lack of real data, low accuracy, and a relatively low false alarm, which are major concerns needing further investigation. In this paper, an attempt to fulfill these gaps by detecting insider threats with the novelties of the present investigation first developed two deep learning hybrid LSTM models integrated with Google's Word2vec LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) GLoVe (Global Vectors for Word Representation) LSTM. Secondly, the performance of two hybrid DL models was compared with the state-of-the-art ML models such as XGBoost, AdaBoost, RF (Random Forest), KNN (K-Nearest Neighbor) and LR (Logistics Regression). Thirdly, the present investigation bridges the gaps of using a real dataset, high accuracy, and significantly lower false alarm rate. It was found that ML-based models outperformed the DL-based ones. The results were evaluated based on earlier studies and deemed efficient at detecting insider threats using the real dataset.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional ML models excel in handling structured features derived from NLP-preprocessed data, such as keyword extraction from emails, leading to high precision in controlled environments.
“They excel in handling structured features derived from NLP-preprocessed data, such as keyword extraction from emails, leading to high precision in controlled environments [60].”
From A systematic review on insider threat detection using natural language processing (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
Section 4.4 says the ML models used selected features from preprocessed Enron financial and email data, and Section 5 reports strong classification performance. But the paper does not say those ML features came from NLP keyword extraction, nor does it characterize the results as applying to controlled environments. Its NLP word embeddings are described as part of the deep-learning models. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- T. Rashid, I. Agrafiotis and J. R. Nurse, "A new take on detecting insider threats: Exploring the use of hidden markov models," in Proc. MIST, Vienna Austria, pp. 47-56, 2016.
- W. Li, W. Meng, L. F. Kwok and H. S. Horace, "Enhancing collaborative intrusion detection networks against insider attacks using supervised intrusion sensitivity-based trust management model," Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 77, pp. 135-145, 2017.
- Authors
- Anul Haq, M., Abdul Rahim Khan, M., & Alshehri, M.
- Affiliations
- Majmaah University (SA)
- ORCID
- Alshehri, Mohammed
- Venue
- Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Tech Science Press
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 619-635
- ISSN
- 1079-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205711848
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Majmaah University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- insider threat detection, word embeddings, Word2Vec, gloves, deep learning, machine learning comparison, false alarm rate, information security, insider attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review