Cited by 18Race, Genetics, and SocietyGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Racial Bias Can Confuse AI for Genomic Studies

Open access
Dai, Beifen, Xu, Zhihao, Li, Hongjue, Wang, Bo, Cai, Jinsong, Liu, Xiaomo·2022·Oncologie

Abstract

Large-scale genomic studies are important ways to comprehensively decode the human genomics, and provide valuable insights to human disease causalities and phenotype developments. Genomic studies are in need of high throughput bioinformatics analyses to harness and integrate such big data. It is in this overarching context that artificial intelligence (AI) offers enormous potentials to advance genomic studies. However, racial bias is always an important issue in the data. It is usually due to the accumulation process of the dataset that inevitability involved diverse subjects with different races. How can race bias affect the outcomes of AI methods? In this work, we performed comprehensive analyses taking The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project as a case study. We construct a survival model as well as multiple artificial intelligence prediction models to analyze potential confusion caused by racial bias. From the genomic discovery, we demonstrated cancer associated genes identified from the major race hardly overlap with the discoveries from minor races from the same causal gene discovery model. We demonstrated that the biased racial distribution will greatly affect the cancer-associated genes, even taking the racial identity as a confounding factor in the model. The prediction models will be potentially risky and less accurate due to the existence of racial bias in projects. Cancer genes from the overall patient model with strong racial bias will be less informative to the minor races. Meanwhile, when the racial bias is less severe, the major conclusion from the overall analysis can be less useful even for the major group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32604/oncologie.2022.020259

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ICML '07 & ILP '07: The 24th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning held in conjunction with the 2007 International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming was held in Corvalis Oregon USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States.
  2. Xu, T., White, J., Kalkan, S., Gunes, H. (2020). Investigating bias and fairness in facial expression recognition. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 506-523. Cham: Springer.
  3. Wang, M., Deng, W. (2020). Mitigating bias in face recognition using skewness-aware reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9322-9331.
  4. Tomczak, K., Czerwińska, P., Wiznerowicz, M. (2015). The cancer genome atlas (TCGA): An immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemporary Oncology, 19(1A), A68-A77. DOI 10.5114/wo.2014.47136. · DOI

Authors
Dai, B., Xu, Z., Li, H., Wang, B., Cai, J., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • Hubei University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Xiaomo
Venue
Oncologie
Published
2022
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
113-130
ISSN
1292-3818 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226336744
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ONCOLOGIE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81400561)
  • State Key Laboratory of Tribology (SKLTKF19B11)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
racial bias, genomic studies, artificial intelligence in genomics, cancer genes, TCGA, survival models, prediction model, confounding factors, minority groups, algorithmic fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review