Cited by 1Advanced Text Analysis TechniquesTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Text Summarization using Extractive and Abstractive Techniques

Open access
Chintan A. Shah, Prof. Neelam Phadnis·2022·International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Abstract

There have been considerable advancements in Text Summarization over the last few years. There are two ways to text summarization: one is based on natural language processing (NLP), and the other is based on deep learning. In the realm of NLP, text summarization is the most intriguing and challenging task. NLP stands for Natural Language Processing, which studies and manipulates human language by computers. Because of the massive increase in information and data, it has become critical. Text summarization is creating a thorough and meaningful summary of text from various sources such as books, news stories, research papers, and tweets, among others. Large text documents that are difficult to summarize manually are the research subject. The job of condensing a piece of text into a shorter version, minimizing the size of the original text while maintaining key informative components and content meaning, is known as summarising. Because human text summarising is a time-consuming and intrinsically tiresome process, automating it is gaining popularity and hence acts as a potent stimulus for academic study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32628/cseit228361

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, Peter J. Liu., “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer” · DOI
  2. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, Veselin Stoyanov. It is based on Google’s BERT model released in 2018,”RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach” · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Shah, C. A., & Phadnis, P. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Mumbai (IN)
  • Department of Computer Engineering, SLRCTE, University of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Venue
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology
Published
2022-05-10
Pages
236-241
ISSN
2456-3307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283835139
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
text summarization, extractive summarization, abstractive summarization, natural language processing, deep learning, information condensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review