Cited by 0Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI in Service InteractionsBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Analyzing the Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Supporting Customer Discovery Activities in Early-Stage Software Startups

Open access

Abstract

Early-stage software startups in Indonesia face a high mortality rate, predominantly driven by a lack of market need and ineffective problem validation. While Customer Discovery is a critical phase to mitigate these risks, it is often hindered by limited resources and time constraints. The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), offers new potential to accelerate iteration and analysis within this process. This study aims to identify Customer Discovery activities supported by GenAI and analyze the adoption levels and human-AI collaboration patterns using the Human-AI Collaboration and Adaptation Framework (HACAF). The research methodology employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews with startup founders in Indonesia. The HACAF framework is utilized to evaluate adoption determinants, including perceptions of technology, compatibility factors, social factors, and personal/environmental factors. The findings are expected to provide a comprehensive mapping of GenAI's role as an assistant, collaborator, or co-creator in market validation, offering strategic guidance for startups to effectively integrate GenAI during the initial product development phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32664/icobits.v1.112

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8

Metadata

Authors
Panjaitan, F. A. H. O., Siahaan, K., Nadeak, A., Situmeang, S., & Simaremare, M.
Affiliations
Institut Teknologi Del (ID)
Venue
ICoBITS
Published
2026-01-19
Volume
1
Pages
694-700
ISSN
3110-7176 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124765109
Cited by
0
References
8
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ICoBITS (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
generative AI, customer discovery, early-stage startups, software startups, large language models, human-AI collaboration, technology adoption, market validation, startup founders, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review