Comunidades indígenas frente a la explotación de litio en sus territorios: contextos similares, respuestas distintas
Open accessAbstract
Se busca comprender las respuestas de dos conjuntos de comunidades indígenas que se encuentran a pocos kilómetros de distancia entre sí, poseen tradiciones culturales y contextos institucionales similares, frente a proyectos de explotación de litio. El argumento general sostiene que los distintos encuadres —dependiente o autonomista— que realizan las comunidades activan demandas diferentes —de reconocimiento o redistribución— y generan procesos que producen respuestas divergentes. El estudio se centra en las comunidades de Salinas Grandes y de Olaroz, provincia de Jujuy, entre 2009 y 2016. La estrategia metodológica combina el análisis en profundidad al interior de cada caso y la posterior comparación de los casos. La base empírica del presente trabajo son 50 entrevistas en profundidad realizadas entre 2016 y 2018, que se complementaron con observaciones en terreno
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These cases highlight the value of well-designed and implemented participatory processes and the importance of direct negotiations of mining companies with communities that can result in support for their activities.
“These cases highlight the value of well-designed and implemented participatory processes and the importance of direct negotiations of mining companies with communities that can result in support for their activities (Göbel 2013; Marchegiani, Hellgren et al. 2019; Pragier 2019; González and Snyder 2021).”
From The impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in achieving sustainable lithium supply in the Lithium Triangle (2022) · cites this paper as Pragier 2019
The Results (page not available) say that direct company–community negotiations can create conditions for acceptance. But they also say inadequate participation and consultation can produce agreements with only parts of a community and weaken its organization. The paper therefore does not show that well-designed participatory processes were implemented in these cases or that they produced community support. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAs a result of issuing land deeds, mining companies require the signature of a representative from the relevant indigenous communities before commencing their activities.
“As a result of issuing land deeds, mining companies require the signature of a representative from the relevant indigenous communities before commencing their activities (Pragier 2019).”
From Mining companies, indigenous communities, and the state: the political ecology of lithium in Chile (Salar de Atacama) and Argentina (Salar de Olaroz-Cauchari) (2022) · cites this paper as Pragier 2019
The passage on Jujuy’s environmental-review rules says companies require a community signature when submitting the environmental report, giving them a measure of social license to begin operating. It links participation requirements to communal land ownership, but does not say that issuing land deeds itself creates the requirement or that a single community representative must sign. The Results passage instead describes signatures from participants in informational meetings. No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Argento, M., Puente, F., & Slipak, A. (2017). ¿Qué debates esconde la explotación del litio en el noroeste argen- tino? Perspectivas y proyeccciones sobre la dinámica empresas-Estado-comunidad. En H. Alimonda, C. Toro Peréz, & F. Martín (Eds.), Ecología política latinoamericana, Pensamiento crítico, diferencia latinoa- mericana y rearticulación epistémica (pp. 403-429).Buenos Aires, Argentina: Clacso. Recuperado de http:/ /ecopoliticavenezuela.org/biblioteca/textos/GT_Ecologia_politica_Tomo_II.pdf#page=404
- Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management journal, 43(4), 717-736.
- Bebbington, A. J., & Bury, J. T. (2009). Institutional challenges for mining and sustainability in Peru. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(41), 17296-17301.
- Delamata, G. (2014). Actualizando el derecho al ambiente. Movilización social, activismo legal y derecho consti- tucional al ambiente de «sustentabilidad fuerte» en el sector extractivista megaminero. Entramados y pers- pectivas, 3(3), 55-90.
- Escobar, A. (2000). El lugar de la naturaleza y la naturaleza del lugar: ¿globalización o postdesarrollo? En E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas.p. 246.Buenos Aires, Argentina: Clacso. Recuperado de http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/lander/ escobar.rtf
- Fraser, N. (2000). ¿De la redistribución al reconocimiento? Dilemas de la justicia en la era postsocialista. New left review, 1, 126-155.
- Fraser, N. (2008). La justicia social en la era de la política de identidad: redistribución, reconocimiento y partici- pación. Revista de trabajo, 4(6), 83-99.
- García Moritán, M., & Cruz, M. B. (2012). Comunidades originarias y grupos étnicos de la provincia de Jujuy. Población y sociedad, 19(2), 155-173.
- Gutierrez, R. A. (2017). La confrontación de coaliciones sociedad-Estado: la política de protección de bosques nativos en Argentina (2004-2015). Revista SAAP, 11(2), 10-30.
- Marchini, J. (2015). Argentina: nuevo rol del Estado y el debate estratégico de los recursos energéticos. En Sobe- ranía, hegemonía e integración de las democracias en revolución en América Latina (pp. 171-186).Quito, Ecuador: Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales.
- Merlinsky, M. G. (2008a). Nuevos repertorios de acción colectiva y conflicto ambiental: una cronología del con- flicto por la instalación de las plantas de celulosa en el Río Uruguay. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. Nouveaux mondes mondes nouveaux-Novo Mundo Mundos Novos-New world New worlds. https://doi.org/10.4000/ nuevomundo.16412 · DOI
- Romero Tovar, M. T. (2009). Antropología y pueblos originarios de la Ciudad de México. Las primeras reflexio- nes. Argumentos (México, DF), 22(59), 45-65.
- Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: A critical frame analysis approach. Greek Review of Social Research, 2005(117), 11-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/grsr.9555 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petavratzi, E., Sanchez-Lopez, D., Hughes, A., Stacey, J., Ford, J., & Butcher, A. (2022) · Mineral Economics · doi:10.1007/s13563-022-00332-4 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Lithium brine mining affects geodiversity and Sustainable Development Goals
Rentier, E. S., Hoorn, C., & Seijmonsbergen, A. C. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114642 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Dorn, F. M., Gundermann, H., & Gundermann, H. (2022) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.5014 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pragier, D.
- Affiliations
- National University of General San Martín (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Pragier, Deborah
- ORCID
- Pragier, Deborah
- Venue
- Polis (Santiago)
- Publisher
- Universidad de Los Lagos, Chile
- Published
- 2019-07-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 52
- ISSN
- 0717-6554 (ISSN-L)
- 0718-6568
- OpenAlex
- W2969592396
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Polis (Santiago) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Polis (Santiago) (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- indigenous peoples, lithium mining, lithium recovery, territorial disputes, indigenous autonomy, Salinas Grandes, Jujuy, mining projects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
