Cited by 0Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAmphibian and Reptile BiologyAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Effect of dietary protein and lipid level on growth and metamorphosis of juvenile axolotl (Ambystoma velasci) reared under culture conditions

Open access
Hernández-Vergara, Martha Patricia, Ramírez-López, Herlindo, Pérez-Rostro, Carlos I., Rosas Vázquez, Carlos·2026·Agro Productividad

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of dietary protein and lipids levels in diets for survival, growth and metamorphosis of juvenile axolotls for its maintenance and conservation in captivity. Design/methodology/approach: Survival, growth, and metamorphosis were evaluated in two completely randomized trials, each lasting 90 days, using juvenile axolotls under laboratory conditions. In the first trial, growth and feed efficiency were evaluated using four isolipidic diets (12% lipid) with four protein levels (35, 40, 45, and 50%), and a commercial diet (manufacturer label: 46% crude protein; analyzed value: ~55%) as a control. In the second experiment, five isoproteic diets (40% protein) with five lipid levels (8, 10, 12, 14, and 16%) were used to assess their effects on growth and metamorphosis. Results: In the protein trial, growth was similar in all axolotls fed with the experimental diets, and significantly higher than the CT (P < 0.05). In the lipids trial, final weight (FW) and daily weight gain (DWG) of axolotls fed L16 were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of the other treatments, whereas the lowest growth was obtained with the lowest lipid level (L8); additionally, metamorphosis frequency increased as dietary lipid content increased, coinciding with a rise in ammonium concentration in the culture water. Limitations on study/implications: Despite originating from the same spawning, the individuals exhibited heterogeneous growth, thus limiting the availability of organisms per treatment. Furthermore, the species is characterized by facultative neoteny, which led to unexpected metamorphosis during the second study. Findings/conclusions: In conclusion, juvenile axolotls’ requirement of protein (%) is between 35–40% and 12–16% lipids to sustain efficient growth, whereas 16% lipids, together with environmental stressors such as elevated ammonium, may trigger metamorphosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32854/fcskzp52

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Hernández-Vergara, M. P., Ramírez-López, H., Pérez-Rostro, C. I., & Rosas Vázquez, C.
Affiliations
  • Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico-Instituto Tecnologico de Boca del Rio
  • Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX)
  • UNAM
Venue
Agro Productividad
Published
2026-08-14
ISSN
  • 2448-7546 (ISSN-L)
  • 2594-0252
OpenAlex
W7223172562
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Agro Productividad (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tecnológico Nacional de México
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
axolotl, Ambystoma velasci, dietary protein, dietary fat, juvenile growth, metamorphosis, survival, feed efficiency, ammonium, amphibian nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review