From Formative Research to Cultural Adaptation of a Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention for Arabic-Speaking Refugees in Germany
Open accessAbstract
Background: This study aims to provide a transparent and replicable documentation approach for the cultural adaptation of a cognitive-behavioural transdiagnostic intervention (Common Elements Treatment Approach, CETA) for Arabic-speaking refugees with common mental disorders in Germany. Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, including literature review, interviews, expert decisions and questionnaires, in order to adapt the original CETA as well as an internet-based guided version (eCETA). The process of cultural adaptation was based on a conceptual framework and was facilitated by an adaptation monitoring form as well as guidelines which facilitate the reporting of cultural adaptation in psychological trials (RECAPT). Results: Consistent with this form and the guidelines, the decision-making process of adaptation proved to be coherent and stringent. All specific CETA treatment components seem to be suitable for the treatment of Arabic-speaking refugees in Germany. Adaptations were made to three different elements: 1) Cultural concepts of distress: a culturally appropriate explanatory model of symptoms was added; socially accepted terms for expressing symptoms (for eCETA only) and assessing suicidal ideation were adapted; 2) Treatment components: no adaptations for theoretically/empirically based components of the intervention, two adaptations for elements used by the therapist to engage the patient or implement the intervention (nonspecific elements), seven adaptations for skills implemented during sessions (therapeutic techniques; two for eCETA only) and 3) Treatment delivery: 21 surface adaptations (10 for eCETA only), two eCETA-only adaptations regarding the format. Conclusion: The conceptual framework and the RECAPT guidelines simplify, standardise and clarify the cultural adaptation process.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These challenges can be mitigated through user-centered cultural and contextual adaptation.
“These challenges can be mitigated through user-centered cultural and contextual adaptation [30,31].”
From Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Göpffarth, D., & Bauhoff, S. (2017). Gesundheitliche Versorgung von Asylsuchenden – Untersuchungen anhand von Abrechnungsdaten der BARMER [Health care services for asylum-seekers – Evidence from claims data of the Barmer insurance plan]. In U. Repschläger, C. Schulte, & N. Osterkamp (Eds.), Barmer GEK Gesundheitswesen aktuell 2017 (pp. 32–65). Retrieved from https://www.barmer.de/blob/133064/111932f27abc3b54594874d07a668a8a/data/dl-3-gesundheitliche-versorgung-von-asylsuchenden---untersuchungen-anhand-von-abrechnungsdaten-der-barmer.pdf
- Authors
- Böttche, M., Kampisiou, C., Stammel, N., El-Haj-Mohamad, R., Heeke, C., Burchert, S., Heim, E., Wagner, B., Renneberg, B., Böttcher, J., Glaesmer, H., Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., Zielasek, J., Konnopka, A., Murray, L., & Knaevelsrud, C.
- Affiliations
- Zentrum Überleben (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- MSB Medical School Berlin (DE)
- Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (DE)
- Leipzig University (DE)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Böttche, Maria
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology in Europe
- Published
- 2021-11-23
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- Special Issue
- Pages
- e4623-e4623
- ISSN
- 2625-3410 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9670828
- OpenAlex
- W3216798702
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology in Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Europe’s Journal of Psychology (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EF1806A, 01EF1806H)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- cultural adaptation, Common Elements Treatment Approach, cognitive-behavioural intervention, Arabic-speaking refugees, online intervention, transdiagnostic treatment, common mental disorders, suicidal ideation, cultural concepts of distress, treatment delivery, refugee mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review