Cited by 9Temporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsOccupational health in dentistry

The effectiveness of orthodontic and osteopathic correction in patients with dental anomalies and musculoskeletal dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint in the presence of concomitant somatic dysfunctions and without it

Open access
Basieva, E. V., Milutka, Yu. A., Tarasov, N. A., Silin, A. V., Mokhov, D. E.·2021·Russian Osteopathic Journal

Abstract

Introduction. The influence of the dental apparatus on the balance of the body in an upright position has been widely discussed in the literature for several decades. Examination of the patient taking into account his postural balance makes it possible to clarify the reasons for the low effectiveness of pain syndromes treatment of the craniocervical region caused by malocclusion, as well as ineffective correction of musculoskeletal dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (MSD TMJ) associated with posture disorders. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of patients with dental anomalies and musculoskeletal dysfunctions of the temporomandibular joint and concomitant somatic dysfunctions (if any) by methods of orthodontic and osteopathic correction. Materials and methods. The study involved 102 patients aged from 18 to 45 years with TMJ. All patients underwent orthodontic and osteopathic examination. 3 groups of patients were formed: № 1 — exclusively with dental anomalies TMJ (occlusive dysfunction), who received only orthodontic treatment, № 2 with concomitant somatic (extra-occlusive) dysfunctions, who received only orthodontic treatment, and №3 with concomitant somatic (extra-occlusive) dysfunctions, who received both orthodontic and osteopathic treatment. Orthodontic treatment of musculoskeletal dysfunction of the TMJ consisted of the occlusive kappa manufacturing. Osteopathic correction was carried out individually, taking into account the identified somatic dysfunctions, on average 3 sessions. Patients also received drug therapy, and they performed myohymnastics for the masticatory muscles. The clinical dysfunction index (Helkimo M.) was used to control the elimination dynamics of the TMJ's musculoskeletal dysfunction symptoms. The assessment of the pain dynamics in the TMJ was carried out by a visual-analog scale (VAS). The evaluation of the osteopathic treatment effectiveness was carried out on the basis of computer stabilometry data and osteopathic examination data. A stabilometric study was performed on the «ST-150» («Biomera») stabiloplatform in the Romberg sample (European foot installation) with open and closed eyes in two positions of the lower jaw: 1) in a state of physiological rest (tooth rows are separated); 2) in the kappa with closed tooth rows. Results. The MSD TMJ symptoms were eliminated 10 weeks after the start of treatment in all (100 %) patients of group № 1 and group № 3. Among the patients in group № 2, only 12,1 % of patients had complete absence of MSD TMJ symptoms, while all patients in this group had a statistically significant decrease in the clinical index of Helkimo dysfunction. In one third of the group № 2 patients on the 12th week of orthodontic treatment, headaches and/or pains in other parts of the musculoskeletal system (neck, back, shoulders, arms) prevailed among complaints and which were previously indicated in the anamnesis. This occurred after the elimination of the MSD TMJ symptoms. The absolute majority of patients in group № 3 (97,1 %) noted the complete disappearance of headaches and/or pains in other parts of the musculoskeletal system (neck, back, shoulders, arms). Also, in patients of this group, stabilometric indicators were normalized in a state of physiological rest and in the kappa. Conclusion. Patients with somatic dysfunctions need complex treatment with the participation of an osteopath and a dentist. When assessing the osteopathic status of a patient, it is important to determine whether the patient has only occlusive dysfunctions or there are also extra-occlusive ones. Additional osteopathic correction is recommended for patients with extraocclusive dysfunctions in order to achieve treatment results comparable in effectiveness and timing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32885/2220-0975-2021-4-63-74

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Osteopathic correction can accompany main dental treatment methods in cases of occlusal disorders, affecting biomechanical disorders in TMJ function and promoting faster and more effective adaptation.

    “Также остеопатическая коррекция может сопровождать основные (стоматологические) методы лечения в случае окклюзионных нарушений, воздействуя на биомеханические нарушения в работе ВНЧС и способствуя более быстрой и эффективной адаптации [18,25].”

    From Results of the osteopathic treatment of the temporomandibular joint dysfunction (meta-analysis) (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper’s Conclusion (page not available in our copy) recommends adding osteopathic correction to dental treatment for patients with extra-occlusal somatic dysfunctions to achieve comparable treatment effectiveness and timing. It does not establish that osteopathic correction directly alters TMJ biomechanics or promotes faster adaptation, and its recommendation is narrower than occlusal disorders generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [4]Милутка Ю. А., Фортин А. Е. Возможности и организационные проблемы диагностики и лечения пациентов с синдромом болевой дисфункции височно-нижнечелюстного сустава. Российский остеопатический журнал. 2020; 4: 95-116. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2020-4-95-116 · DOI
  2. [5]Palano D., Molinari G., Cappelletto M., Guidetti G., Vernole B. The role of stabilometry in assessing the correlations between craniomandibular disorders and equilibrium disorders. Bull. Group Int. Rech. Sci. Stomatol. Odontol. 1994; 37 (1-2): 23-26.
  3. [8]Мохов Д. Е. Основные теоретические аспекты функционирования постуральной системы. Мануал. тер. 2009; 1 (33): 76-82.
  4. [9]Мохов Д. Е., Бабкин О. А. Роль проприорецепции глазодвигательных мышц в поддержании равновесия и распределении мышечного тонуса. Мануал. тер. 2010; 2 (38): 52-58.
  5. [10]Миронов А. А., Халили В. Д., Потехина Ю. П., Первушкин Э. С. Постуральная роль стопы и ее нарушение при плоскостопии (обзор литературы). Российский остеопатический журнал. 2020; 1-2: 147-157. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2020-1-2-147-157 · DOI
  6. [11]Курникова А. А., Потехина Ю. П., Филатов А. А., Калинина Е. А., Первушкин Э. С. Роль опорно-двигательного аппарата в поддержании постурального баланса (обзор литературы). Российский остеопатический журнал. 2019; 3-4: 135-149. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2019-3-4-135-149 · DOI
  7. [12]Mentzelopoulos S. D., Sigala J., Roussos C., Zakynthinos S. G. Static pressure-volume curves and body posture in severe chronic bronchitis. Europ. Respir. J. 2006; 28 (1): 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00008806 · DOI
  8. [13]Bartolo M., De Nunzio A. M., Sebastiano F., Spicciato F., Tortola P., Nilsson J., Pierelli F. Arm weight support training improves functional motor outcome and movement smoothness after stroke. Functional Neurol. 2014; 29 (1): 15-21.
  9. [15]Иванов В. В., Марков Н. М. Влияние зубочелюстной системы на постуральный статус пациента. Мануал. тер. 2013; 3 (51): 83-89.
  10. [16]Martin D., Mate A., Valenzuela J. Clinical treatment objectives of the FACE philosophy. Clin. Cases. Orthodontics. 2015; 79 (158): 14-35.
  11. [17]Okeson J. P. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019; 512 p.
  12. [18]Фадеев Р. А., Ронкин К. З., Прозорова Н. В., Мартынов И. В., Гилина Т. А., Фишман Б. Б., Синельченко В. Н. Миорелаксационный эффект применения ТЭНС-терапии в реабилитации пациентов с зубочелюстными аномалиями, осложенными заболеваниями ВНЧС и жевательных мышц. Институт стоматологии. 2016; 4 (73): 34-39.
  13. [19]Rani S., Pawah S., Gola S., Bakshi M. Analysis of Helkimo index for temporomandibular disorder diagnosis in the dental students of Faridabad city: A cross-sectional study. J. Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17 (1): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.194941 · DOI
  14. [20]Alonso-Royo R., Sanchez-Torrelo C. M., Ibanez-Vera A. J., Zagalaz-Anula N., Castellote-Caballero Y., Obrero-Gaitan E., Ro-dnguez-Almagro D., Lomas-Vega R. Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders. Diagnostics. 2021; 11 (3): 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472 · DOI
  15. [21]Gil-Martinez A., Grande-Alonso M., Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva I., Lopez-Lopez A., Fernandez-Carnero J., La Touche R. Chronic Temporomandibular Disorders: disability, pain intensity and fear of movement. J. Headache Pain. 2016; 17 (1): 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0690-1 · DOI
  16. [24]Combadazou J.-C., Hennequin A., Benichou M., Roumiguie C., Destruhaut F. Stabilometry platform benefits in diagnosis and occlusal orthosis treatment of occluso-postural deficiency: preliminary study on 30 patients. Oral Hlth Care. 2019; 4: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15761/OHC.1000180 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basieva, E. V., Milutka, Y. A., Tarasov, N. A., Silin, A. V., & Mokhov, D. E.
Affiliations
  • North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU)
  • Institute of Osteopathy
  • Mechnikov North-West Medical State University; St. Petersburg State University
Venue
Russian Osteopathic Journal
Published
2021-12-30
Issue
4
Pages
63-74
ISSN
2220-0975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200061802
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Russian Osteopathic Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, orthodontic treatment, osteopathic correction, dental anomalies, malocclusion, postural stability, posturography, Romberg test, masticatory muscles, pain assessment, somatic dysfunction, occlusal splint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review