Cited by 0Nutritional Studies and DietLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNuts composition and effects

Portfolio Dietary Pattern and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials

Open access
Chiavaroli, Laura, Nishi, Stephanie, Khan, Tauseef A., Braunstein, Catherine R., Glenn, Andrea J., Blanco Mejia, Sonia, Rahelić, Dario, Kahleová, Hana +4 more·2024

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.05.004 · Paper page

Abstract

Background The evidence for the Portfolio dietary pattern, a plant-based dietary pattern that combines recognized cholesterol-lowering foods (nuts, plant protein, viscous fibre, plant sterols), has not been summarized. Objective To update the European Association for the Study of Diabetes clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials using GRADE of the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on the primary therapeutic lipid target for cardiovascular disease prevention, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and other established cardiometabolic risk factors. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library through April 19, 2018. We included controlled trials ≥ 3-weeks assessing the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on cardiometabolic risk factors compared with an energy-matched control diet free of Portfolio dietary pattern components. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome was LDL-C. Data were pooled using the generic inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2-statistic). GRADE assessed the certainty of the evidence. Results Eligibility criteria were met by 7 trial comparisons in 439 participants with hyperlipidemia, in which the Portfolio dietary pattern was given on a background of a National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step II diet. The combination of a portfolio dietary pattern and NCEP Step II diet significantly reduced the primary outcome LDL-C by ~17% (MD, −0.73 mmol/L, [95% CI, −0.89 to −0.56 mmol/L]) as well as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, C-reactive protein, and estimated 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, compared with an NCEP Step 2 diet alone (p < 0.05). There was no effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or body weight. The certainty of the evidence was high for LDL-cholesterol and most lipid outcomes and moderate for all others outcomes. Conclusions Current evidence demonstrates that the Portfolio dietary pattern leads to clinically meaningful improvements in LDL-C as well as other established cardiometabolic risk factors and estimated 10-year CHD risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32920/26521333.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66

Authors
Chiavaroli, L., Nishi, S., Khan, T. A., Braunstein, C. R., Glenn, A. J., Blanco Mejia, S., Rahelić, D., Kahleová, H., Salas-Salvadó, J., Jenkins, D. J. A., Kendall, C. W. C., & L. Sievenpiper, J.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University Hospital Dubrava (HR)
  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (US)
Published
2024-08-08
OpenAlex
W4401417097
Cited by
0
References
66
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • PepsiCo
  • General Mills
  • California Strawberry Commission
  • Arizona State University
  • Danone
  • Almond Board of California
  • Saskatchewan Pulse Growers
  • Diabetes Canada
  • Canadian Nutrition Society
  • St. Michael's Hospital Foundation
  • Canola Council of Canada
  • Loblaw Companies Limited
  • Danish Cancer Society Research Center
  • Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • European Association for the Study of Diabetes
  • Alpro Foundation
  • International Nut and Dried Fruit Council
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  • Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto
  • Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
Keywords
cardiovascular disease prevention, LDL cholesterol, hyperlipidemia, phytosterols, nuts, plant proteins, cardiometabolic risk factors, coronary heart disease risk, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, nutritional therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review