The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Multi-Head CNN-based Software Development Risk Classification
Open accessAbstract
Agile methodology for software development has been in vogue for a few decades, notably among small and medium enterprises. The omission of an explicit risk identification approach turns a blind eye to a range of perilous risks, thus dumping the management into strenuous situations and precipitating dreadful issues at the crucial stages of the project. To overcome this drawback a novel Agile Software Risk Identification using Deep learning (ASRI-DL) approach has been proposed that uses a deep learning technique along with the closed fishbowl strategy, thus assisting the team in finding the risks by molding them to think from diverse perspectives, enhancing wider areas of risk coverage. The proposed technique uses a multi-head Convolutional Neural Network (Multihead-CNN) method for classifying the risk into 11 classes such as over-doing, under-doing, mistakes, concept risks, changes, differences, difficulties, dependency, conflicts, issues, and challenges in terms of producing a higher number of risks concerning score, criticality, and uniqueness of the risk ideas. The descriptive statistics further demonstrate that the participation and risk coverage of the individuals in the proposed methodology exceeded the other two as a result of applying the closed fishbowl strategy and making use of the risk identification aid. The proposed method has been compared with existing techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Generalized Linear Models (GLM), and CNN using specific parameters such as accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Experimental findings show that the proposed ASRI-DL technique achieves a classification accuracy of 99.16% with a small error rate with 50 training epochs respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziana M., A., & J., C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Computer Science, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education
- Department of Software Engineering, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education
- Venue
- International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems
- Published
- 2023-12-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1087-1095
- ISSN
- 1847-6996 (ISSN-L)
- 1847-7003
- OpenAlex
- W4389625455
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Keywords
- agile software development, risk identification, risk coverage, software project risk management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Head CNN-based Software Development Risk Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.32985/ijeces.14.10.1
- The paper
- Ziana M., A., & J., C. (2023). Multi-Head CNN-based Software Development Risk Classification. International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems. https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.14.10.1