PENERAPAN METODE CPM DAN GRANTT CHART UNTUK MENGUKUR EFISIENSI WAKTU (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Rumah Perum GIP Kertosono, Nganjuk)
Open accessAbstract
The implementation of housing unit construction needs to be done in order to control time efficiently. Therefore, the delay of the house will result in inefficient costs. This study aims (1) to determine the scheduling sequence of the type 45/90 residential development project at Perum GIP Kertosono, Nganjuk (2) to determine the network or network in the type 45/90 residential development project at Perum GIP Kertosono, Nganjuk (3) To understand] the critical activities carried out in the housing construction project type 45/90 at Perum GIP Kertosono, Nganjuk, (4) To find out the activities carried out jointly in the housing construction project type 45/90 Perum GIP Kertosono, Nganjuk. This research uses the Critical Path Method (CPM) or the critical path and the Grantt Chart method. The application of the CPM method is used to determine the time for effective and efficient development projects. While the grantt chart method is used to determine the activities carried out and the busiest time in the housing development project activities. Through the application of CPM resulted in efficient development implementation with a time of 84 days or 19 days faster than the total time predicted by the planning team for 103 working days. Through the grant chart method, it was found that the busiest times of construction were on the 16th to the 53rd day because at that time it was carried out simultaneously with the installation of sloofs, concrete columns, installation of floor tiles and construction of terraces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gantt Chart as a visualization tool helps users understand workflow and monitor activity progress more effectively.
“penggunaan Gantt Chart sebagai alat visualisasi jadwal terbukti mampu membantu pengguna dalam memahami alur pekerjaan dan memantau progres aktivitas secara lebih efektif.”
From Implementasi Penjadwalan Produksi dengan Visualisasi Gantt Chart Berbasis Web Pada PT. IPPI (2026) · cites this paper as Kurniawan, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementasi Penjadwalan Produksi dengan Visualisasi Gantt Chart Berbasis Web Pada PT. IPPI
Lee, M. K., Birowo, S., & Bunfa, L. (2026) · Jurnal Informatika dan Bisnis · doi:10.46806/jib.v15i1.2174
- Authors
- Kurniawan, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Kurniawan, Rony
- ORCID
- Kurniawan, Rony
- Venue
- JURNAL EKONOMI DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN
- Publisher
- Universitas Slamet Riyadi
- Published
- 2021-01-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1412-193X (ISSN-L)
- 2654-4016
- OpenAlex
- W3161235912
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JURNAL EKONOMI DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- critical path method, Gantt chart, construction scheduling, housing construction, housing development, time efficiency, critical activities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review