The DOI matches its Crossref record; 265 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Background and objectives: The evidence base supporting the National Chlamydia Screening Programme, initiated in 2003, has been questioned repeatedly, with little consensus on modelling assumptions, parameter values or evidence sources to be used in cost-effectiveness analyses. The purpose of this project was to assemble all available evidence on the prevalence and incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in the UK and its sequelae, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy (EP) and tubal factor infertility (TFI) to review the evidence base in its entirety, assess its consistency and, if possible, arrive at a coherent set of estimates consistent with all the evidence. Methods: Evidence was identified using ‘high-yield’ strategies. Bayesian Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis models were constructed for separate subparts of the clinical and population epidemiology of CT. Where possible, different types of data sources were statistically combined to derive coherent estimates. Where evidence was inconsistent, evidence sources were re-interpreted and new estimates derived on a post-hoc basis. Results: An internally coherent set of estimates was generated, consistent with a multifaceted evidence base, fertility surveys and routine UK statistics on PID and EP. Among the key findings were that the risk of PID (symptomatic or asymptomatic) following an untreated CT infection is 17.1% [95% credible interval (CrI) 6% to 29%] and the risk of salpingitis is 7.3% (95% CrI 2.2% to 14.0%). In women aged 16–24 years, screened at annual intervals, at best, 61% (95% CrI 55% to 67%) of CT-related PID and 22% (95% CrI 7% to 43%) of all PID could be directly prevented. For women aged 16–44 years, the proportions of PID, EP and TFI that are attributable to CT are estimated to be 20% (95% CrI 6% to 38%), 4.9% (95% CrI 1.2% to 12%) and 29% (95% CrI 9% to 56%), respectively. The prevalence of TFI in the UK in women at the end of their reproductive lives is 1.1%: this is consistent with all PID carrying a relatively high risk of reproductive damage, whether diagnosed or not. Every 1000 CT infections in women aged 16–44 years, on average, gives rise to approximately 171 episodes of PID and 73 of salpingitis, 2.0 EPs and 5.1 women with TFI at age 44 years. Conclusions and research recommendations: The study establishes a set of interpretations of the major studies and study designs, under which a coherent set of estimates can be generated. CT is a significant cause of PID and TFI. CT screening is of benefit to the individual, but detection and treatment of incident infection may be more beneficial. Women with lower abdominal pain need better advice on when to seek early medical attention to avoid risk of reproductive damage. The study provides new insights into the reproductive risks of PID and the role of CT. Further research is required on the proportions of PID, EP and TFI attributable to CT to confirm predictions made in this report, and to improve the precision of key estimates. The cost-effectiveness of screening should be re-evaluated using the findings of this report. Funding: The Medical Research Council grant G0801947.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Existing reviews highlight the effectiveness of a number of interventions for PPD including medication (eg, antidepressant medication), health promotion interventions (eg, educational home visits) and psychological interventions (eg, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy.16–27”
From Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive-behavioural therapy based interventions for maternal peripartum depression: A systematic review, meta-analysis and thematic synthesis protocol (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Ingleby, D. (1967) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(67)90197-6 · Cited by 8,616
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008929526011 · Cited by 5,397
Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease.
(1968) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-69-5-1085_2 · Cited by 3,251
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Public Health England (PHE), 2014, National Chlamydia Screening Programme
- Chief Medical Officer’s Expert Advisory Group, 1998, Main Report of the CMO’s Expert Advisory Committee on Chlamydia trachomatis
- Public Health England (PHE), 2006, The UK National Screening Committee Policy on Chlamydia Screening in Adults
- European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), 2008, Review of Chlamydia Control Activities in EU Countries: Technical Report
- Hocking, 2010, Protocol 12PRT/9010:Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot (ACCEPt): a cluster randomised controlled trial of chlamydia testing in general practice (ACTRN1260000297022)
- Spiegelhalter, 2007, WinBUGS User Manual Version 1.4, January 2003
- Horner, 2006, UK National Guideline for the Management of Genital Tract Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis
- Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2014, Recommendations for the Collection of Forensic Specimens from Complainants and Suspects
- Paavonen, 2008, Sexually Transmitted Disease, 1021
- British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) Clinical Effectiveness Group, 2012, UK National Guideline for the Management of Bacterial Vaginosis
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2013, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Clinical Knowledge Summary
- Health & Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), 2012, Hospital Episode Statistics
- Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2012, Conception Statistics, England and Wales
- National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, 2013, Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), 2011, Facts and Figures. Long-term Trends Data – Patients Treated
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2008, Facts and Figures 2006: Fertility Problems and Treatment
- Thorne, 2011, UK National Screening Committee Policy Review: Chlamydia Screening in Pregnancy: an Evidence Review
- Kaltenthaler, 2011, Identifying and Reviewing Evidence to Inform the Conceptualisation and Population of Cost-effectiveness Models
- Glanville, 2010, Evidence-based Decisions and Economics: Health Care, Social Welfare, Education and Criminal Justice
- Rothman, 2008, Modern Epidemiology
- Spiegelhalter, 1998, Bayesian Deviance: the Effective Number of Parameters, and the Comparison of Arbitrarily Complex Models
- Lunn, 2004, WinBUGS Development Interface (WBDev)
- Lunn, 2004, WinBUGS Differential Interface (WBDiff)
- Ohlssen, 2006, Conflict Diagnosis in Directed Acyclic Graphs
- Rahm, 1986, Asymptomatic carriage of Chlamydia trachomatis: a study of 109 teenage girls, Eur J Sex Transm Dis, 3, 91
- Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2014, Population Estimates for Years 2000–2010
- Health Protection Agency (HPA), 2010, STI Episodes seen in GUM Clinics: Annual Data Tables 2008
- Lazaro, 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections in Primary Care
- Hoyme, 2012, Laparoscopic diagnosis of chlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease and its impact on chlamydia screening programmes, Eur Obstet Gynaecol, 7, 9
- Hughes G, Williams T, Simms I. Trends in Diagnoses of Genital Chlamydia and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Primary Care, 1990–2003: Analysis of Data in the General Practice Research Database. Health Protection Agency Annual Conference, University of Warwick, Warwick, 13–15 September 2004.
- Ross, 2011, UK National Guideline for the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
- Ross, 1999, National guideline for the management of pelvic infection and perihepatitis, Sex Transm Infect, 75, S54
- Narvanen, 1997, Detection of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis with peptide-based species-specific enzyme immunoassay, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, 5
- Horner, 2010, Twelfth International Symposium on Human Chlamydial Infections, 453
- Van Valkengoed GM. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis Infections: Should We Screen? Doctoral Dissertation. Wageningen: Vrije Universiteit, Ponsen en Looijen BV; 2001.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis
Hellmich, B., águeda, A. F., Monti, S. M., Buttgereit, F., de BOYSSON, H., Brouwer, E., Cassie, R., Cid, M. C., Dasgupta, B., Dejaco, C., et al. (2019) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672 · Cited by 1,231
EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice
Dejaco, C., Ramiro, S., Duftner, C., Besson, F. L., Bley, T. A., Blockmans, D., Brouwer, E., Cimmino, M. A., Clark, E., Dasgupta, B., et al. (2018) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649 · Cited by 974
Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead
Unemo, M., Bradshaw, C. S., Hocking, J. S., de Vries, H. J. C., Francis, S. C., Mabey, D. C. W., Marrazzo, J. M., Sonder, G. J. B., Schwebke, J. R., Hoornenborg, E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30310-9 · Cited by 776
Duncan, E., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, N., Croot, L., Sworn, K., Turner, K. M., Yardley, L., & Hoddinott, P. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516 · Cited by 481
Self-citationDelaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
Travers, J., Romero‐Ortuño, R., Bailey, J., & Cooney, M. T. (2018) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp18x700241 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, M. J., Ades, A., Soldan, K., Welton, N. J., Macleod, J., Simms, I., DeAngelis, D., Turner, K. M., & Horner, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Public Health England (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Public Health England (formerly Health Protection Agency), Colindale, London, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Health Technology Assessment
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1-250
- ISSN
- 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
- 2046-4924
- PMC
- PMC4819202
- OpenAlex
- W2309207579
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 266
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (G0801947)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- Chlamydia trachomatis, chlamydia screening, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility, salpingitis, cost-effectiveness, natural history of infection, incidence and prevalence, attributable risk, reproductive outcomes, women's health, National Chlamydia Screening Programme
- MeSH terms
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Incidence, Prevalence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review