Cited by 4Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Stabilization of Clayey Soil with Alkali-activated Hybrid Slag/Cement

Open access
Yıldırım, Eray, Bol, Ertan, Avcı, Eyübhan, Özocak, Aşkın·2023·Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering

Abstract

This study investigates the stabilization performance of clayey soil treated with alkali-activated hybrid slag/cement. Sodium silicate (SS) and sodium hydroxide (SH) are used as alkali activators, whereas ground blast furnace slag (GGBS) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) are used as sources of aluminosilicate. A total of 27 different types of mixtures are used for stabilization. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of untreated clay and stabilized soils are performed at immediately, 3-, 7-, 28-, and 90 days curing times under air-dried and wet-cured conditions. In addition, 90-d volume and mass changes in the samples are measured. Stabilized samples with an SS/SH ratio of 1 under air-dried conditions reveal moistening at early curing ages (≤28 days); afterward, sodium carbonate crystals appear in these samples at longer curing ages. Geopolymer-treated clayey soil exhibits lower volumetric and mass changes compared with OPC. Most of the stabilized clayey soil with alkali-activated hybrid slag/cement exhibits higher strength compared with OPC under air-dried and wet-cured conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3311/ppci.21964

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 4

Authors
Yıldırım, E., Bol, E., Avcı, E., & Özocak, A.
Affiliations
  • Sakarya University (TR)
  • Bursa Technical University (TR)
Venue
Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering
Published
2023-10-04
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
260-273
ISSN
  • 0553-6626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1587-3773
OpenAlex
W4387339268
Cited by
4
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Technical University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Sakarya Üniversitesi Kurumsal Açık Akademik Arşivi (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sakarya Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
soil stabilization, clay soil, alkali-activated materials, ground granulated blast furnace slag, ordinary Portland cement, sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, geopolymer, unconfined compressive strength, water curing, volume change, mass change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review