The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“The Perils of Library Instruction”: Contextualizing EdTech's Encroachment on Teaching Through Labour Theory of Value in Academic Libraries
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we argue that the crisis of teaching can be understood as a crisis of labour that continues to impact academic librarians because it is a historical process grounded in larger socio-political shifts precipitated by capitalism. We demonstrate that the emergence and development of teaching—and specifically teaching information literacy (IL) as a kind of librarian curriculum—in academic libraries in North America corresponds to the emergence of neoliberalism. The shocks created by neoliberal fiscal austerity along with anxiety about de-professionalization and de-skilling provoked by cheaper and more widely available information technology created a mounting crisis of legitimacy in librarianship throughout the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Librarians ostensibly remedied this crisis through the positioning of IL as a central contribution of the profession to the academy and society. The COVID-19 pandemic and economic recessions have only intensified the proletarianization processes that have been ongoing since the 1970s. As teaching, learning, and assessment technologies proliferate in the academy, librarians cannot teach more efficiently to meet the needs of growing university populations. Instead, they must rethink the purpose and goals of librarian teaching in the context of the academy. The question of teaching will not be solved until material conditions of librarian labour in the academy are solved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“it holds potential to meaningfully address them in teaching and learning settings, especially when a critical lens is applied to present-day information tools and environments (Pho and Tranfield, 2024; Zvyagintseva and Blechinger, 2023).”
From Two decades of critical information literacy: a review and analysis of the literature (2025) · cites this paper as Zvyagintseva and Blechinger, 2023
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“CIL itself cannot solve any widespread problems”
From Two decades of critical information literacy: a review and analysis of the literature (2025) · cites this paper as Zvyagintseva and Blechinger, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-AI Collaboration for Smart Education: Reframing Applied Learning to Support Metacognition
Hutson, J., & Plate, D. (2023) · Advanced Virtual Assistants - A Window to the Virtual Future [Working Title] · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1001832 · Cited by 42
Student Success and the Neoliberal Academic Library
Beilin, I. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v1.24303 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Almeida, Nora. 2022. “Library Tautology: A Reenactment of the One-Shot.” College & Research Libraries 83, no. 5: 833–36. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/25585/33469. · DOI
- Altman, Sam (@sama). 2022. “I think US college education is nearer to collapsing than it appears.” Twitter. March 20, 2022, 11:31 a.m. https://twitter.com/sama/status/1505597901011005442.
- Apostle, Richard, and Boris Raymond. 1997. Librarianship and the Information Paradigm. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
- Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668.
- Auten, Beth, Rebecca Croxton, and Catherine Tingelstad. 2020. “Extending Our Reach: Integrating Librarians and Library Resources into Canvas.” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 39, no. 2: 101–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2020.1734395 · DOI
- Babb, Maureen. 2021. “A Reflection on Precarity.” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 16, no. 2: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i2.6655. · DOI
- Bell, Daniel. 1979. “The Social Framework of the Information Society.” In The Computer Age: A 20 Year View, edited by Michael L. Dertoozos and Joel Moses, 500–49. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Blechinger, Joel. 2021. “Indicators of Truly Epic Post-ness: Information Literacy, Authority, and the Contemporary Political Podcasting Ecosystem.” Paper presented at Politics of Libraries III: Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Intersectionality in LIS, online, University of Alberta, April 23, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-dg60-m911. · DOI
- Brons, Adena, Chloe Riley, Crystal Yin, and Ean Henninger. 2018. “Catalog Cards from the Edge: Precarity in Libraries.” Presentation at BC Library Conference, Vancouver, BC, May 10, 2018. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/18214.
- Coates, Hamish, Richard James, and Gabrielle Baldwin. 2005. “A Critical Examination of the Effects of Learning Management Systems on University Teaching and Learning.” Tertiary Education and Management 11, no. 1: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-004-3567-9. · DOI
- Contrino, Jacline L. 2016. “Instructional Learning Objects in the Digital Classroom: Effectively Measuring Impact on Student Success.” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 10, nos. 3–4: 186–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2016.1206786. · DOI
- Dyer-Witheford, Nick, Atle Mikkola Kjøsen, and James Steinhoff. 2019. Inhuman Power: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Capitalism. London: Pluto Press. · DOI
- Enright, Nathaniel F. 2013. “The Violence of Information Literacy: Neoliberalism and the Human as Capital.” In Information Literacy and Social Justice: Radical Professional Praxis, edited by Lua Gregory & Shana Higgins, 15–38. Sacramento: Library Juice Press.
- Felten, Edward, Manav Raj, and Robert Seamans. 2023. “How Will Language Modelers Like ChatGPT Affect Occupations and Industries?” March 1, 2023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4375268. · DOI
- Felten, Edward, Manav Raj, and Robert Seamans. 2021. “Occupational, Industry, and Geographic Exposure to Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Dataset and Its Potential Uses.” Strategic Management Journal 42, no. 12: 2195–2217. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3286. · DOI · Paper page
- Ford, Emily, Betty Izumi, Jost Lottes, and Dawn Richardson. 2015. “Badge It! A Collaborative Learning Outcomes Based Approach to Integrating Information Literacy Badges within Disciplinary Curriculum.” Reference Services Review 43, no. 1: 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0026. · DOI
- Fumagalli, Andrea, Alfonso Giuliani, Stefano Lucarelli, and Carlo Vercellone. 2019. Cognitive Capitalism, Welfare and Labour: The Commonfare Hypothesis. New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Groover, Myron, Eveline Houtman, Eva Revitt, and Joanne Rodger. 2022. “Special Focus on Labour in Canadian Academic Libraries.” Special section, Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 8. https://cjal.ca/index.php/capal/issue/view/2555. · DOI
- Held, Tim. 2010. “Blending In: Collaborating with an Instructor in an Online Course.” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 4, no. 4: 153–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2010.528272. · DOI
- Henninger, Ean, Adena Brons, Chloe Riley, and Crystal Yin. 2020. “Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Precarious Positions in Canadian Libraries: Statistical Analysis of a National Job Board.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 15, no. 3: 78–102. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29783. · DOI
- Hoffmann, Kristin, and Emily Carlisle-Johnston. 2021. “‘Just Like When I Was a Liaison’: Applying a Liaison Approach to Functional Library Models.” The Journal of Creative Library Practice, https://creativelibrarypractice.org/2021/03/26/just-like-when-i-was-a-liaison-applying-a-liaison-approach-to-functional-library-models/.
- Hoodless, Catherine and Stephen Pinfield. 2018. “Subject vs. Functional: Should Subject Librarians Be Replaced by Functional Specialists in Academic Libraries?” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50, no. 4: 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616653647. · DOI
- Hutson, James, Theresa Jeevanjee, Vanessa Vander Graaf, Jason Lively, Joseph Weber, Graham Weir, Kathryn Arnone, et al. 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and the Disruption of Higher Education: Strategies for Integrations across Disciplines." Creative Education 13, no. 12: 3953–80. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.1312253. · DOI
- Khreiche, Mario. 2022. Modularity, Labor, and Ideology in Edtech Platforms. Fast Capitalism 19, no. 1: 122–30. https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202201.011. · DOI
- Kissel, Francia, Melvin R. Wininger, Scott R. Weeden, Patricia A. Wittberg, Randall S. Halverson, Meagan Lacy, and Rhonda K. Huisman. 2016. “Bridging the Gaps: Collaboration in a Faculty and Librarian Community of Practice on Information Literacy.” In Information Literacy: Research and Collaboration across Disciplines, edited by Barbara J. D’Angelo, Sandra Jamieson, Barry Maid, & Janice R. Walker, 411–28. Denver: University Press of Colorado. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/12036. · DOI
- Li, Cyndi. 2021. “Integration of Library Systems into LMS to Enhance E-Resources Accessibility.” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 33, no. 4: 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1988490. · DOI
- Maclin, Edward. 2022. “Learning Management Systems as Anti-convivial Tools.” Fast Capitalism 19, no. 1: 113–21. https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202201.010. · DOI
- Maidment-Otlet, Richard. 2021. “Digital-First Approaches and the Library Brand in a Post-Pandemic World.” In Libraries, Digital Information, and COVID: Practical Applications and Approaches to Challenge and Change, edited by David Baker and Lucy Ellis, 103–110. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88493-8.00016-1. · DOI
- Meulemans, Yvonne N., and Allison Carr. 2012. “Not At Your Service: Building Genuine Faculty-Librarian Partnerships.” Reference Services Review 41, no. 1: 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321311300893. · DOI
- Moulier-Boutang, Yann. 2011. Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Nicholson, Karen P. 2019. “On the Space/Time of Information Literacy, Higher Education, and the Global Knowledge Economy.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 2, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v2i1.86. · DOI
- Nicholson, Karen P. 2016. “‘Taking Back’ Information Literacy: Time and the One-Shot in the Neoliberal University.” In Vol. 1 of Critical Library Pedagogy Handbook edited by Nicole Pagowsky and Kelly McElroy, 25–39. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fimspub/41/.
- O'Connor, Lisa G. 2009. “Information Literacy as Professional Legitimation: The Quest for a New Jurisdiction.” Library Review 58, no. 7: 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910978190. · DOI
- Ovetz, Robert. 2021. “The Algorithmic University: On-Line Education, Learning Management Systems, and the Struggle over Academic Labor.” Critical Sociology 47, nos. 7–8: 1065–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520948931. · DOI
- Popowich, Sam. 2019. “‘The Power of Knowledge, Objectified’: Immaterial Labor, Cognitive Capitalism, and Academic Librarianship.” Library Trends 68, no. 2: 153–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2019.0035. · DOI
- Popowich, Sam. 2018. “Libraries, Labour, Capital: On Formal and Real Subsumption.” Journal of Radical Librarianship 4: 6–19. https://journal.radicallibrarianship.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25.
- Robinson, Bruce. 2019. Review of Inhuman Power: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Capitalism, by Nick Dyer-Witheford, Atle Mikkola Kjøsen and James Steinhoff. Marx & Philosophy, October 6, 2019. https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/17397_inhuman-power-artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-capitalism-by-nick-dyer-witheford-atle-mikkola-kjosen-and-james-steinhoff-reviewed-by-bruce-robinson
- Seale, Maura. 2016. “Enlightenment, Neoliberalism, and Information Literacy.” Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1, no. 1: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v1.24308. · DOI
- Seale, Maura. 2013. “The Neoliberal Library.” In Information Literacy and Social Justice: Radical Professional Praxis, edited by Lua Gregory & Shana Higgins, 39–61. Sacramento: Library Juice Press.
- Srnicek, Nick. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Sullivan, Matthew C. 2019a. “Libraries and Fake News: What’s the Problem? What’s the Plan?” Communications in Information Literacy 13, no. 1: 91–113. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.7. · DOI
- Sullivan, Matthew C. 2019b. “Why Librarians Can’t Fight Fake News.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51, no. 4: 1146–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618764258. · DOI
- Wishkoski, Rachel, Kacy Lundstrom, and Erin Davis. 2018. “Librarians in the Lead: A Case for Interdisciplinary Faculty Collaboration on Assignment Design.” Communications in Information Literacy 12, no. 2: 166–92. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.2.7. · DOI
- Yang, Hong. 2023. “How I Use ChatGPT Responsibly in My Teaching.” Nature, April 12, 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01026-9. · DOI
- Yousefi, Baharak. 2022. “Four Provocations for the Time Being.” Closing keynote address at the Critical Librarianship and Pedagogy Symposium, online, University of Arizona, November 4, 2022.
- Zvyagintseva, Lydia, and Tim Ribaric. 2023. “No Justice, Only Struggle: Academic Restructuring and Library Labour in Authoritarian Capitalism.” Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 8 (January): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v8.38423. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two decades of critical information literacy: a review and analysis of the literature
Tewell, E. (2025) · Information Research an international electronic journal · doi:10.47989/ir30colis52267 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Zvyagintseva, L., & Blechinger, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Mount Royal University (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship
- Published
- 2023-12-19
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2369-937X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389944713
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- library instruction, information literacy instruction, academic librarians, neoliberalism, proletarianization, deprofessionalization, deskilling, COVID-19 pandemic, economic recession, capitalism, North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review