Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mentalizing: An Exploration of its Potential Contribution to Understanding the Challenges Faced by Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors in Couple Therapy

MacIntosh, Heather·2013·Couple and Family Psychoanalysis

Abstract

It is the objective of this paper to bring together clinical findings of a study examining the use of emotionally focused therapy for couples (EFT) with couples where one partner had experienced childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and the empirical literature on the relationship between CSA and adult couple functioning. A specific focus was placed on the potential role of mentalizing in furthering our understanding of the challenges that CSA survivors face in their couple relationships and in couple therapy. These clinical findings are suggestive of the possibility that it may be through the mechanism of impairment to mentalizing capacity that CSA survivors develop and maintain distress in intimate relationships and that it is these deficits that may help us understand the challenges CSA survivors face in the process of couple therapy. Clinical vignettes and transcripts were utilised to illustrate this hypothesis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33212/cfp.v3n2.2013.188

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
MacIntosh, H.
Venue
Couple and Family Psychoanalysis
Published
2013-09-30
Volume
3
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2044-4141
  • 2044-4133
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mentalizing: An Exploration of its Potential Contribution to Understanding the Challenges Faced by Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors in Couple Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.33212/cfp.v3n2.2013.188
The paper
MacIntosh, H. (2013). Mentalizing: An Exploration of its Potential Contribution to Understanding the Challenges Faced by Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors in Couple Therapy. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.33212/cfp.v3n2.2013.188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.