Cited by 1,125Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningViral-associated cancers and disorders

2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes

Open access
Teras, Lauren R., DeSantis, Carol E., Cerhan, James R., Morton, Lindsay M., Jemal, Ahmedin, Flowers, Christopher R.·2016·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Collectively, lymphoid neoplasms are the fourth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The authors provide contemporary lymphoid neoplasm statistics by subtype based on the 2008 World Health Organization classifications, including the most current US incidence and survival data. Presented for the first time are estimates of the total numbers of US lymphoid neoplasm cases by subtype as well as a detailed evaluation of incidence and survival statistics. In 2016, 136,960 new lymphoid neoplasms are expected. Overall lymphoma incidence rates have declined in recent years, but trends vary by subtype. Precursor lymphoid neoplasm incidence rates increased from 2001 to 2012, particularly for B-cell neoplasms. Among the mature lymphoid neoplasms, the fastest increase was for plasma cell neoplasms. Rates also increased for mantle cell lymphoma (males), marginal zone lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, and mycosis fungoides. Like incidence, survival for both mature T-cell lymphomas and mature B-cell lymphomas varied by subtype and by race. Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas had among the worst 5-year relative survival (36%-56%, depending on race/sex), while those with mycosis fungoides had among the best survival (79%-92%). For B-cell lymphomas, 5-year survival ranged from 83% to 91% for patients with marginal zone lymphoma and from 78% to 92% for those with hairy cell leukemia; but the rates were as low as 47% to 63% for patients with Burk…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/caac.21357

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teras, L. R., DeSantis, C. E., Cerhan, J. R., Morton, L. M., Jemal, A., & Flowers, C. R.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Teras, Lauren R.
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
443-459
ISSN
  • 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4863
OpenAlex
W2518731208
Cited by
1,125
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 166 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
71.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Keywords
lymphoid malignancies, lymphoma incidence, lymphoma survival, WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms, B-cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, plasma cell neoplasms, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, mycosis fungoides, Burkitt lymphoma, racial disparities in survival, incidence trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review